Fagan Study guides, Revision notes & Summaries

BPP Tort Law GDL Revision andChapter Notes GRADED A+ Tort Revision Ch 2: Trespass to the Person Trespass to the person is the intentional cause of injury, as opposed to the negligent cause of injury. An employer can be vicariously liable for an employee who commits trespass. 1) Assault 2) Battery 3) The Rule in Wilkinson v Downton 4) False Imprisonment Actionable per se: without proof of damage and require an act, not an omission Battery “the direct and intentional application of...

Milton Harrison District Representative Carlton Lampkins 1st District Representative Brainpower Read More Previous Play Next Rewind 10 seconds Move forward 10 seconds Unmute 0:10 / 0:15 Full screen Jamaul Jerido 2nd District Representative Michael Littlejohn District of Keeper of Records and Seals Derrick Lowery District Keeper of Finance Gerald Folsom District Chaplain Charles Coleman Jr. District Counselor Zane E. Cypress Jr...

INTRO TO SCHOOL PSYCH - CHAPTER 1 What is a school psychologist according to NASP? ANSWER = School psychologists help children and youth succeed academically, socially, and emotionally. They collaborate with educators, parents, and other professionals to create safe, healthy, supportive learning environments. What are the minimum training requirements according to NASP? ANSWER = Fagan and Wise definition of a school psychologist ANSWER = A school psychologist is a professional psycholog...

Simple and understandable English to describe the concepts of what is law and what makes a legal system, as debated and described by Hart, Fuller, and others in their books. This part of the course covers positivist vs. Other theories of law. The readings prescribed by Professors Fagan and Moshikaro.

LAWS10078 Contract Charter Reinsurance v Fagan Reinsurance case (traditional approach of contractual interpretation)

BPP Tort Law GDL Revision andChapter Notes GRADED A+ Tort Revision Ch 2: Trespass to the Person Trespass to the person is the intentional cause of injury, as opposed to the negligent cause of injury. An employer can be vicariously liable for an employee who commits trespass. 1) Assault 2) Battery 3) The Rule in Wilkinson v Downton 4) False Imprisonment Actionable per se: without proof of damage and require an act, not an omission Battery “the direct and intentional application of f...

LATEST CASE EXAM; Criminal law [100% PASS] /verified/ Cunningham [1957] *Ans* Definition of 'maliciously' for the purposes of the Offences against the Person Act 1861: actual intention or subjective recklessness: a) did the defendant foresee the harm? b) but "unreasonably" continued regardless. 2nd leg objective: reasonable to take risk. "Cognitive Mens Rea" Parker (1976) *Ans* Modified Cunningham test: closing one's eyes to an obvious risk Stephenson [1979] *Ans* Confirms Cunni...

Contemporaneity rule fagan v mpc [1969], thabo-meli v r [1954] Statutory duty of care s1 children & young persons act 1933 Strict liability r v prince [1875], r v blake [1997] Duty of care / special relationship r v gibbons & proctor [1918] Duty of care / assumption of care r v stone & dobinson [1977] Duty of care / contract of employment r v pittwood [1902] Duty of care / official position r v dytham [1979]

CCE Practice Exam 5 - Questions and Answers (Complete Solutions) In working with a client who has received a diagnosis of Dissociative Identity Disorder, a cognitive therapist's initial goal would be: A. to collaborate with the client to identify specific treatment goals. B. to make a "cognitive diagnosis" for the purpose of developing a concrete treatment plan. C. to identify the cognitive antecedents and consequences that are sustaining the client's multiple personalities. D. to establis...

BPP Tort Law GDL Revision and Chapter Notes negligent cause of injury. An employer can be vicariously liable for an employee who commits trespass. 1) Assault 2) Battery 3) The Rule in Wilkinson v Downton 4) False Imprisonment Actionable per se: without proof of damage and require an act, not an omission Battery “the direct and intentional application of force by D to C without lawful justification”. 1) Intentional a) Letang v Cooper: Negligence is not enough to show intentiona...