Police force Study guides, Revision notes & Summaries

This document contains workings, explanations and solutions to the CPR3701 Assignment 2 (QUALITY ANSWERS) Semester 1 2024. For assistance call or us on 0.6.8..8.1.2..0.9.3.4...... Question 1 Not yet answered Marked out of 1.00 Flag question Question text Choose the CORRECT answer from the following statements a. A conviction on the competent verdict must be regarded as an acquittal on the original charge b. Where the express charge is not proved by the prosecution, the court may still resort to ...

CPR3701 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 1 2024 (262267) - DUE 29 April 2024 ;100% TRUSTED workings, explanations and solutions. for assistance Whats-App.......0.6.7..1.7.1..1.7.3.9............ Question 1 Not yet answered Marked out of 1.00 Flag question Question text Choose the CORRECT answer from the following statements a. A conviction on the competent verdict must be regarded as an acquittal on the original charge b. Where the express charge is not proved by the prosecution, the cou...

CPR3701 Assignment 1 Semester 1 2024 (answers) Question 1 Not yet answered Marked out of 1.00 Flag question Question text The law of criminal procedure a. is a branch of substantive law b. deals with the detection, investigation and prosecution of criminals. c. determines , prescribes the elements that constitute, for example, the crime of rape d. does not deal with the detection, investigation and prosecution of suspects and accused persons. e. does not essentially deal with t...

Well-structured LEV3701 Assignment 2 (ANSWERS) Semester 1 2024 - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED. (DETAILED ANSWERS - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED!)..... QUESTION 1 Consider the following statements about circumstantial evidence and choose the correct option: 1. Circumstantial evidence is not necessarily weaker than direct evidence and the cumulative effect of several pieces of circumstantial evidence might even carry more weight than direct evidence. 2. The following rules apply to inferences drawn from c...

Miranda vs. Arizona - Answer- The supreme court case in which the court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police. Mapp v. Ohio - Answer- Evidence illegally gathered by the police may not be used in a criminal trial Terry vs. Ohio - Answer- Allowed the police to stop and search a suspect if he has reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is...

INC3701 Assignment 3 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) 2024 (688457)- DUE 25 June 2024 ; 100% TRUSTED workings, explanations and solutions. for assistance Whats-App 0.6.7..1.7.1..1.7.3.9 ............. Question 1 1.1 Explain to a novice educator on, what does a one size fits all approach mean in teaching. [5] 1.2 Why have some researchers questioned the effectiveness of a one-size-fits-all approach for image descriptions, particularly for people who are blind or visually impaired (BLV)? Provide specific reas...

This document contains workings, explanations and solutions to the INC3701 Assignment 3 (QUALITY ANSWERS) 2024. For assistance call or us on 0.6.8..8.1.2..0.9.3.4........ Question 1 1.1 Explain to a novice educator on, what does a one size fits all approach mean in teaching. [5] 1.2 Why have some researchers questioned the effectiveness of a one-size-fits-all approach for image descriptions, particularly for people who are blind or visually impaired (BLV)? Provide specific reasons mentioned i...

MPOETC ACT 120 CERTIFICATION EXAM REVIEW Situation where two people agree to commit a crime and are caught later? - ANSWER conspiracy When applying a tourniquet to someone, where should you write the time on their body at which it was applied? - ANSWER forehead What color does a police officer work in? (Traffic Light Analogy) - ANSWER yellow ...

Louisiana POST Study Guide (Answered 100% Correctly) Latest Louisiana POST Study Guide (Answered 100% Correctly) Latest Miranda vs. Arizona The supreme court case in which the court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against selfincrimination prior to questioning by police. Mapp v. Ohio Evidence illegally gathered by the police may not be used in a criminal trial Terry vs. Ohio Allowed the police to stop and se...

Two guys agree to commit a crime and get caught later? correct answer: Conspiracy When applying the tourniquet, where do you write? correct answer: Forehead and time What color does a police officer work in? correct answer: Yellow What is the speed limit in an urban area? correct answer: 35 Mph Guy robs officer house what do you do? correct answer: No chase him using lethal force Clandestine Lab correct answer: Call DEA Cruiser Ready AR? correct answer: Bolt closed, cham...