General defences Study guides, Revision notes & Summaries

Well-structured LEV3701 Assignment 2 (ANSWERS) Semester 1 2024 - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED. (DETAILED ANSWERS - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED!)..... QUESTION 1 Consider the following statements about circumstantial evidence and choose the correct option: 1. Circumstantial evidence is not necessarily weaker than direct evidence and the cumulative effect of several pieces of circumstantial evidence might even carry more weight than direct evidence. 2. The following rules apply to inferences drawn from c...

LOD301 Assignment 2 (DETAILED ANSWERS) Semester 2 2023 - DUE 22 SEPTEMBER 2023 100% TRUSTED workings, explanations and solutions. For assistance call or us on . Important notice: No answer may exceed 2 (two) pages. The reason for this is that you must be able to extract the salient points on the topic from your textbook and other sources and answer questions straight to the point. It will show your lecturer that you have studied the topics and developed good insight and are not merely...

First Class Criminal Law Notes detailing the following: Actus reus and mens rea; Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person; General defences – Consent as a defence to a NFAOP and Duress and necessity; Participation and group crime; Homicide – Murder and key concepts of causation and Involuntary manslaughter; Inchoate offences; Homicide – Voluntary manslaughter; Offences against property – Theft; Denial of a Crime – Intoxication and Automation; Insanity – denial of a crime and general de...

QUESTION 1 Discuss the causality (at the expense of requirement) requirement of enrichment liability. (10) QUESTION 2 In McCarthy Retail Ltd v Shortdistance Carriers CC 2001 (3) SA 482 (SCA) para [9] the court said: “We now know from the hard print that there is a common-law basis for the acceptance of a general enrichment action, at least one of a subsidiary nature. In this respect the decision of the majority in Nortje’s case has been shown by the then largely dormant authority to b...

LML4806 PORTFOLIO MEMO - MAY/JUNE 2024 - SEMESTER 1 - UNISA - DUE DATE :- 17 MAY 2024 (DETAILED ANSWERS WITH FOOTNOTES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED!) QUESTION 1 [20] 1.1 According to Milton Friedman, “there is one and only one social responsibility of business – to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits…” With reference to the principle of corporate social responsibility, discuss the meaning of corporate social responsibility and...

LML4806 PORTFOLIO MEMO - MAY/JUNE 2024 - SEMESTER 1 - UNISA - DUE DATE :- 17 MAY 2024 - DETAILED ANSWERS - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED! QUESTION 1 [20] 1.1 According to Milton Friedman, “there is one and only one social responsibility of business – to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits…” With reference to the principle of corporate social responsibility, discuss the meaning of corporate social responsibility and whether you agree with Milton Fr...

QUESTION 1 Discuss the causality (at the expense of requirement) requirement of enrichment liability. (10) QUESTION 2 In McCarthy Retail Ltd v Shortdistance Carriers CC 2001 (3) SA 482 (SCA) para [9] the court said: “We now know from the hard print that there is a common-law basis for the acceptance of a general enrichment action, at least one of a subsidiary nature. In this respect the decision of the majority in Nortje’s case has been shown by the then largely dormant authority to b...

PVL3704 PORTFOLIO MEMO - MAY/JUNE 2022 - SEMESTER 1 QUESTION 1 Discuss the requirement that the defendant must have been enriched. (10) QUESTION 2 In McCarthy Retail Ltd v Shortdistance Carriers CC 2001 (3) SA 482 (SCA) para [9] the court said: “We now know from the hard print that there is a common-law basis for the acceptance of a general enrichment action, at least one of a subsidiary nature. In this respe...

CISI – Regulations Final Exam Study Questions with COMPLETE SOLUTIONS (LATEST 2024] Criminal offence: General defences insider dealing - CORRECT ANSWER No advantage was expected. A belief that the information had been widely disclosed Would have dealt anyway Did not expect the recipient to deal Special defences : insider dealing - CORRECT ANSWER Stabilisation Market information Market makers in the ordinary course of business If a UK company offers an inducement to a foreign agent ...