Unjustified enrichment Study guides, Revision notes & Summaries

PVL3702-summary of notes Law of Contract (University of South Africa) lOMoARcPSD| Page 1 of 88 LAW OF CONTRACT STUDY UNIT 1 1. Distinguish between a contract and unjustified enrichment. (5) A contract is an agreement entered into with the intention of creating an obligation or obligations. A contract is therefore a fact, an event. From a contract, arises an obligation or obligations. Undue enrichment is a principle of our law that no-one should unjustifiedly be enriched at the expense o...

1 PVL3704 - exam notes Law Of Enrichment Liabilty And Estoppel (University of South Africa) lOMoARcPSD| 1 1 Exam Notes - PVL 3704 UNJUSTIFIED ENRICHMENT LIABILITY STUDY UNIT 1 - Overview Explain why there is a need for unjustified enrichment liability in any developed system of law? Liability for enrichment is necessary in any developed legal system. There are cases in which one person obtains assets belonging to another person in circumstances where there are no grounds for ...

Contract and Unjustified Enrichment.

PVL3704 EXAM MCQ May/June 2009 Choose the most correct option in every instance. (1) A has demanded payment from B of an amount of R50,000 which he believes B is owing. B has checked its records and has paid the amount in the bona fide belief that the amount is owing in terms of their contract. Unbeknown to B, his bookkeeper, C had already paid the amount a week earlier by way of an electronic funds transfer into the account of A. At the time of the second payment A's account was overdraw...

Contains Latest summaries of the following Unjustified Enrichment & Estoppel Cases: 1. Nortje v Pool; 2. Gouws v Jester Pools; 3. Gouws v Jester Pools; 4. Brooklyn House Furnishers v Knoetze; 5. Willis Faber Enthoven; 6. CIR v First National International Bank; 7. Govender v Standard Bank of South Africa; 8. CIR v Visser; 9. FNB v B & H Engineering; 10. Leeuw v FNB; 11. Odendaal v Van Oudtshoorn; 12. Thomas v Baumann & Gilfillan; 13. Electrolux (Pty) Ltd v Khota, etc..

PVL3704 ASSIGNMENT 01 FIRST SEMESTER 2024 DUE DATE: 12 MARCH 2024 NO EXTENSION COMPULSORY ASSIGNMENT: Please note that there are two questions in this assignment. Both questions must be answered, but only one question will be marked. The other question is a self-assessment activity, but detailed feedback will be provided to you during the cause of the semester. Please note: This is a compulsory assignment for PVL3704. This assignment should be submitted by all students registered...

PVL3704_ STUDY PACK QUESTION AND ANSWER. Enrichment Liability And Estoppel. What is the appropriate enrichment action that B must institute against the bank (C) according to case law? 1 The condictio sine causa. 2 The condictio indebiti. 3 The condictio causa data causa non secuta. 4 The condictio ob turpem vel iniustam causam. 5 The actio negotiorum gestorum contraria. (2) Question 16 Indicate which one of the following is not a requirement for a valid reliance on estoppel: 1 There mus...

PVL3704 Assignment 2 Semester 1 2023 100% TRUSTED workings, explanations and solutions. For assistance call or whatsapp us on +25479 811 9845 . QUESTION 1 A has demanded payment from B of an amount of R50,000 which he believes B is owing. B has checked its records and has paid the amount in the bona fide belief that the amount is owing in terms of their contract. Unbeknown to B, his bookkeeper, C had already paid the amount a week earlier by way of an electronic funds transfer in to the account...

PVL3702 Assignment 2 (DETAILED ANSWERS) Semester 1 2024 - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED Answers, guidelines, workings and references .............. Question 1 Answer saved Marked out of 1.00 Flag question Question text Gary points a loaded gun at Pete, and orders him to sign a written contract. Gary explains that the document is for the sale of Pete’s car to him (Gary), at a price of R50 000 which is far below the market value of the car. Pete, fearin...