100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary abstract intermediate management accounting

Rating
-
Sold
2
Pages
36
Uploaded on
26-11-2015
Written in
2015/2016

This document provides a comprehensive summary of the box intermediate management accounting. Also the case elaborations treated in college can be found.

Institution
Module

Content preview

Intermediate management Accounting
Hoorcollege 1 31 Augustus
Standard economic assumption:
Shareholders want profit; goals of managers/employees are in conflict with this goal; people
act self-interested
- Hidden information: Agents (employees) have insights in own productivity level, firm
specific information à Misrepresentation of that information (e.g. people extract extra
budget for their own department)
- Hidden action: Agents (employees) may underperform because the firm cannot
always see their performance. Likewise owners are also unable to observe
actions of managers

Davila and Foster (2005)

General findings about management accounting systems:
1. MAS (need to) grow over a firm’s life cycle
2. (cash) budgets are the earliest system adopted
3. MAS depend on various firm characteristics
• CEO: experience and beliefs
• # employees
• Venture capitalist presence
4. Positive association between adoption of budgets and firm performance (CAUSALITY?)
Why do managers persist in using inferior accounting data to make decisions?
Economic darwinism: If system survives: benefits > costs over long run
à Inaccurate costing, simple cost drivers sometimes beneficial (Dearman & Shields,
1983)
à Conflicting goal; e.g. tax issue, important behavioral cost consequence
≠ Optimal; not econ. Efficient
Better systems may exist, but have not yet been discovered. Some systems are legitimate
(reach consensus) for different stakeholders (Meyer and Rowan 1977)
Evolution depends on
- Nature of competition, strategic orientation (Krishnan 2005; Sandino 2007)
- CEO/ CFO style (Naranjo-Gil et al. 2009)
- Age, maturity of the company (Davila and Foster, 2005)
- New trends: EVA, BSC, …

, Hoofdstuk 2 the nature of costs
Cost: amount of resources sacrificed or forgone to achieve a precise objective
Cost function: costs vary:
- over time
- over units produced

Accounting cost: C(Q) = FC + VC * (Q)
In general, no linear relation
Marginal cost: cost of producing 1 additional unit
MC = d(TC)/dQ
average cost per unit = TC/Q

Sunk cost (fixed or variable): expenditures incurred in the past that cannot be recovered
Committed cost: costs to be incurred in the future, but will be incurred
Relevant cost: costs to be considered in decision-making

Step costs vs. mixed costs
- Step costs: expenditures fixed over a range of output levels
- Mixed costs: costs that cannot be classified as being purely fixed or purely variable

Opportunity cost: benefit foregone as a result of doing one action instead of another
Valuation of intangible aspects (real options valuation)
Opportunity set (alternative actions) is determining the costs
E.g. Consider various job offers
Opportunity cost ó accounting expense

Opportunity cost Accounting expense
Sacrifice of the best alternative for a given Cost incurred to generate a revenue
action
Measured in cash (equivalents) Costs actually consumed (after decision
à approximations to estimate OC making
Include tangible and intangible assets Historical cost valuation (recorded in
monetary terms
Estimates for future benefits Backward looking
Decision making Decision control

Costs relevant for decision making:
- past costs are always irrelevant: sunk costs, committed costs, past variable costs
- not all future costs are relevant: only those which vary with decisions
excess capacity as an opportunity cost
note: production line cannibalization
(e.g. introduction new product à competition with other products)

Written for

Institution
Study
Module

Document information

Uploaded on
November 26, 2015
Number of pages
36
Written in
2015/2016
Type
SUMMARY

Subjects

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
erikb2710 Tilburg University
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
24
Member since
11 year
Number of followers
18
Documents
3
Last sold
6 year ago

3.0

3 reviews

5
0
4
1
3
1
2
1
1
0

Trending documents

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these revision notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No problem! You can straightaway pick a different document that better suits what you're after.

Pay as you like, start learning straight away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and smashed it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions