Transdisciplinarity Samenvattingen, Aantekeningen en Examens

Summary of the literature from the course 'Science Communication 2.0: Dialogue and Transdisciplinarity'. The articles summarised: Week 1: - Nisbet, M. C., & Scheufele, D. A. (2009). What's next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. American journal of botany, 96(10), 1767-1778. - Kurath, M., & Gisler, P. (2009). Informing, involving or engaging? Science communication, in the ages of atom-, bio-and nanotechnology. Public Understanding of Science, 18(5), 559-...

CUS3701 Assignment 2 2023 100% CORRECT questions, answers, workings and explanSTUDENT DECLARATION FORM DEPARTMENT OF CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTIONAL STUDIES COLLEGE OF EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA I (full names): Chante Kruger Student number: Module: CUS3701 Declare that… 1. I understand what plagiarism entails and am aware of the University’s policy in this regard. 2. I declare that this assignment is my own, original work. Where I used someone else’s work, whether a printed source,...

This document contains all Lectures, including my notes, Tutorial Questions and answers, and some discussion Questions. IT includes a table of content so you can easily find the different Lectures and the related concepts. For a short version of this, see my summary (7 pages long) which only inlcudes the most important concepts per lecture. With this script, you basically don't need to go to the lectures anymore, you can just read through the whole script and you have all the information needed...

1. “Norm” is derived from the word “normal”. It refers to the quality assurance process. False 2. A mediator is a person who makes it possible for an idea to be communicated.  True 3. The IQMS policy supports the use of an assessment policy and uses a four-point scale.  True 4. According to Prof. Asmal, the father of OBE in South Africa, OBE Focuses on the students and their abilities.  True 5. The RNCS document is based on C2005, but it streamlined the curriculum a...

I used this document to study for the exam. You can also use it as an overview to check what you've studied. It is very short, so it summarizes the most important concepts of the course. I got an 8 with this. Whether you want to check your knowledge, just use it to get a general overview of the course material, or even if you don't have time to go through the whole script, I recommend reading through this summary.

Notes from 12 lectures, week 1 - week 6.

This document consists of the following: Explanations and examples The factors of effective questioning An essay discussing the following statement, “As interpreter and developer of the curriculum, it’s insufficient for the educator to give a narrow definition to the concept “curriculum”. An essay on how the approaches to curriculum development presented by Tyler, Stenhouse and Freire were used in the development, interpretation and implementation of Curriculum 2005, both its revi...

This document consists of the following: Explanations and examples The factors of effective questioning An essay discussing the following statement, “As interpreter and developer of the curriculum, it’s insufficient for the educator to give a narrow definition to the concept “curriculum”. An essay on how the approaches to curriculum development presented by Tyler, Stenhouse and Freire were used in the development, interpretation and implementation of Curriculum 2005, both its revi...

Summary of the article ‘Informing, involving or engaging? Science communication, in the ages of atom-, bio- and nanotechnology' by Kurath & Gisler (2009).This is reading material for week 1 of the course Science Communication 2.0 at WUR, which is one of the compulsory courses in period 1 of the master MHS.