Ultra petita Samenvattingen, Aantekeningen en Examens

My LLM dissertation focuses on the efficacy of Article V(1)(c) under the New York Convention towards resisting the enforceability of arbitral awards. My paper examines the following issues: (1) 'Ultra Petita' Awards; (2) 'Infra Petita' Awards; and (3) Partial Enforcement. It is followed by a conclusion on the provision's efficacy and recommendations towards improving its efficacy.

What are the key features of New York Convention? What is the scope of application of New York Convention? What are the fundamental principles of interpreting Article V? How can parties be prevented from resisting enforcement? How is Article V(1)(a) interpreted? How is Article V(1)(b) interpreted? How is Article V(1)(c) interpreted? How is Article V(1)(d) interpreted?

Andere onderwerpen: 1. De omvang van het geding 2. Verbod ultra petita 3. Ambtshalve toetsing versus aanvulling 4. De procedure in eerste aanleg en het procesbelang 5. Personenfuik en onderdelenfuik 6. Het dictum van de uitspraak 7. Voorbeeldvragen 1. De goede procesorde 2. Inleiding bewijsrecht 3. Actieve houding van de rechter 4. Bewijslastverdeling 5. Bewijslast versus bewijsvoeringslast 6. Bewijsmaatstaaf 7. Voorbeeldvraag 8. Inleiding toetsing door de rechter 9. Hoe to...

• New York Convention o Key Features o Scope of Application • Article V – Fundamental Principles of Interpretation • Preventing Parties Resisting Enforcement • Article V(1)(a) – Invalidity of the Arbitration Agreement o Choice of law o Kompetenz-Kompetenz o Burden of proof • Article V(1)(a) – Parties’ Incapacity o Choice of law • Article V(1)(b) – Due Process o Proper notice o Unable to present his case o Choice of law • Article V(1)(c) – Excess of Manda...

Bestuurs(proces)recht II, samenvatting literatuur week 6 semester 2