mrl2601 entrepreneurial law mrl2601 assignment 2 year 2023
Geschreven voor
University of South Africa (Unisa)
MRL2601 - ENTREPRENEURIAL LAW (MRL2601)
Alle documenten voor dit vak (197)
Verkoper
Volgen
TheEconomist
Ontvangen beoordelingen
Voorbeeld van de inhoud
+27 680 77 9615
info@furtherstudiesinstitute.com
280 Oak Avenue, Randburg, Johannesburg, ZA
, +27 680 77 9615
info@furtherstudiesinstitute.com
280 Oak Avenue, Randburg, Johannesburg, ZA
QUESTION 1
Themba, who was a manager of the Men’s Club, approached the Commission
for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (the CCMA) seeking severance pay
after he was retrenched. The trade union that he belongs to was informed that
he was not employed by the Men’s Club, but that he was in fact employed by a
company named Bad Boys (Pty) Ltd. The trade union duly cited Bad Boys (Pty)
Ltd as the respondent in a referral to the CCMA. The sole director and
shareholder of Bad Boys (Pty) Ltd, Tendai Munyai, during conciliation indicated
that the Men’s Club was insolvent and that Themba had been dismissed for
operational reasons. The commissioner advised Themba to refer an unfair
dismissal dispute. When the matter was referred for arbitration, both the Men’s
Club and Bad Boys (Pty) Ltd were cited as respondents. After hearing the matter,
the commissioner ordered Bad Boys (Pty) Ltd to pay Themba an amount of R250
000 for his unfair dismissal. However, it was discovered that Bad Boys (Pty) Ltd
had no assets. In fact, Tendai Munyai who also participated in the running of the
business had provided financial assistance to Bad Boys (Pty) Ltd and he had
secured claims against the company for repayment of the loan amounts.
Themba intends to seek an order from the Labour Court to the effect that Tendai
Munyai was his true employer and that he must pay him the amount of R250 000.
With reference to the relevant legislation and case law, indicate what Themba
would have to prove in order to hold Tendai Munyai liable. (20)
To hold Tendai Munyai liable for his unfair dismissal, Themba would have to establish
that Tendai Munyai was his true employer and that he acted unlawfully in dismissing
him. This would require a consideration of the relevant legislation and case law,
including the control test and the economic reality test, as well as any other relevant
factors such as the procedural and substantive fairness of the dismissal.
In addition, section 65 of the Close Corporations Act of 1984 may be relevant to this
matter. This section provides that a member of a close corporation may be held liable
Voordelen van het kopen van samenvattingen bij Stuvia op een rij:
Verzekerd van kwaliteit door reviews
Stuvia-klanten hebben meer dan 700.000 samenvattingen beoordeeld. Zo weet je zeker dat je de beste documenten koopt!
Snel en makkelijk kopen
Je betaalt supersnel en eenmalig met iDeal, creditcard of Stuvia-tegoed voor de samenvatting. Zonder lidmaatschap.
Focus op de essentie
Samenvattingen worden geschreven voor en door anderen. Daarom zijn de samenvattingen altijd betrouwbaar en actueel. Zo kom je snel tot de kern!
Veelgestelde vragen
Wat krijg ik als ik dit document koop?
Je krijgt een PDF, die direct beschikbaar is na je aankoop. Het gekochte document is altijd, overal en oneindig toegankelijk via je profiel.
Tevredenheidsgarantie: hoe werkt dat?
Onze tevredenheidsgarantie zorgt ervoor dat je altijd een studiedocument vindt dat goed bij je past. Je vult een formulier in en onze klantenservice regelt de rest.
Van wie koop ik deze samenvatting?
Stuvia is een marktplaats, je koop dit document dus niet van ons, maar van verkoper TheEconomist. Stuvia faciliteert de betaling aan de verkoper.
Zit ik meteen vast aan een abonnement?
Nee, je koopt alleen deze samenvatting voor €2,65. Je zit daarna nergens aan vast.