Criminal evidence Study guides, Class notes & Summaries

Miranda vs. Arizona - Answer- The supreme court case in which the court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police. Mapp v. Ohio - Answer- Evidence illegally gathered by the police may not be used in a criminal trial Terry vs. Ohio - Answer- Allowed the police to stop and search a suspect if he has reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is...

RRLLB81 ASSIGNMENT 2 MEMO - SEMESTER 1 - 2023 - UNISA - (DETAILED RESEARCH REPORT WITH FOOTNOTES - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED) ALL TOPICS INCLUDED!!!!! THE FOLLOWING TOPICS ARE AVAILABLE:- MERCANTILE LAW TOPIC 1: INSURANCE LAW THE INSURED’S DUTY TO TAKE REASONABLE PRECAUTIONS TO AVOID LOSS OR DAMAGE TO THE OBJECT OF RISK ️ TOPIC 2: BANKING LAW NATIONAL CREDIT ACT 34 OF 2005 AND REGULATIONS: PRE-AGREEMENT ASSESSMENT ️ TOPIC 3: COMPANY LAW BUSINESS RESCUE ️ TOPIC ...

Criminology unit 3 notes latest with summary (100% well Enlightened). Criminology unit 3 notes latest with summary (100% well enlightened 1. AC 1.1 - Evaluate the effectiveness of the roles of personnel involved in criminal investigations. (10 marks) 2. AC 1.2 assess the usefulness of the investigative techniques in criminal investigations (20 marks) 3. AC1.3 explain how evidence is processed (6 marks) 4. AC 1.4 examine the rights of individuals in criminal investigations (6 marks) 5...

QUESTION 1: CIVIL PRACTICE [50] 1.1 Ms. Sue Zim, a businesswoman, has purchased goods on credit to the value of R 500,000 from WoodPeckers (Pty) Ltd. The goods are delivered by WoodPeckers (Pty) Ltd to Ms. Zim, and a copy of the invoice is handed to Ms Zim. Despite requests by WoodPeckers (Pty) Ltd, Ms Zim does not pay or settle the amount. WoodPeckers (Pty) Ltd wants to sue Ms. Zim for the outstanding amount. The company’s director approaches you for legal advice or assistance rega...

LCR4805 ASSIGNMENT 1 MEMO - SEMESTER 1 - 2023 - UNISA - (DETAILED ANSWERS - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED) QUESTION 1 During the recruitment of new staff, an employer checks the profiles of the candidates on various social networks and includes information from these networks in the screening process. The employer has not informed the candidates about this. 1.1 Does the Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 allow an employer to include information of candidates found on social networks ...

Well-structured CPR3701 Assignment 2 (ANSWERS) Semester 1 2024 - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED . (DETAILED ANSWERS - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED!................................Question 1 Not yet answered Marked out of 1.00 Flag question Question text Choose the CORRECT answer from the following statements a. A conviction on the competent verdict must be regarded as an acquittal on the original charge b. Where the express charge is not proved by the prosecution, the court may still resort to a competent ver...

Tort - Answer- A private or civil wrong or injury, other than a breach of contract. Preponderance of evidence - Answer- The amount of information needed to decide in favor of a party in a civil suit. It consists of more than fifty percent of the believable evidence in favor of the party's suit or defense. One more fact than the other party has established. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt - Answer- The amount of information needed to convict a person of a crime. It is enough evidence to el...

This document contains workings, explanations and solutions to the IND2601 Assignment 2 (QUALITY ANSWERS) Semester 1 2024 - For assistance call or Whats-App us on 0.6.8...8.1.2...0.9.3.4........ Question 1 Complete Marked out of 1.00 Question 2 Complete Marked out of 1.00 Question 3 Complete Marked out of 1.00 QUIZ Which of the following statements DOES NOT signify mangangaahla (to move the jaw) in sentencing under customary law? a. The amount of talking that the court offi cial...

Louisiana POST Study Guide (Answered 100% Correctly) Latest Louisiana POST Study Guide (Answered 100% Correctly) Latest Miranda vs. Arizona The supreme court case in which the court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against selfincrimination prior to questioning by police. Mapp v. Ohio Evidence illegally gathered by the police may not be used in a criminal trial Terry vs. Ohio Allowed the police to stop and se...

TLI4801 ASSIGNMENT 2 MEMO - SEMESTER 1 - 2024 UNISA – DUE DATE: - 22 APRIL 2024 (DETAILED ANSWERS WITH FOOTNOTES AND A BIBLIOGRAPHY - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED!) Assignment 02 – Semester 1 Answer the following questions using proper references. Your entire assignment answer (questions 1 (a)-(e)) must not exceed 15 pages. 1. Mr. Z is arrested on charges of culpable homicide. The prosecutor avers that he was the driver of a motor vehicle which on 15 December 2023 was involved in a motor v...