LPL4802 (LPL4802)

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

LPL4802 law-of- damages-notes.100% TRUSTED Answers, guidelines, workings and references.LAW OF DAMAGES NOTES: CHAPTER 1: Definition, nature and scope of the law of damages Definition: The law of damage is that part of the law which indicates how the existence and extent of damage, as well as the proper amount of damages are to be determined in the case of delict, breach of contract and other legal principles providing for the payment of damages. Nature and scope The law of damages shou...

lpl4802-damages-assignment-answer.100% TRUSTED Answers, guidelines, workings and references.In Stewart v Botha 1 the court discussed the legal standing if the doctor had not failed to inform the parents of the risk of birth defects to the potential child, the child would not have been born at all to experience the pain and suffering attributable to his disability in the sense the mother would have elected to terminate the pregnancy. The SCA concurred with the trial court that the claim on b...

LPL4802 Assignment 1 (ANSWERS) Semester 2 2023 ().100% TRUSTED Answers, guidelines, workings and references. Y, a female minor student at Smarties Junior Academy in Pretoria, was born with a congenital cardiac failure that imperils other vital organs. The result is that she does not enjoy the normal amenities of life and is often sickly. She believes that her mother’s obstetrician, Doctor X, ought to have diagnosed this prenatal ailment and advised her mother accordingly. Her mother, Mrs B, co...

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

LPL4802 Assignment 1 Semester 2 2023 () - DUE 18 August 2023 COMPLETE ANSWERS

WELL OUTLINED ANSWERS

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

QUESTIONS WITH ANSWERS

SET 1QUESTION Question 1 Which one of the following is not recognised as a legal subject in our law? [I] Trade unions [2] Banks [3] Universities [4] Partnerships Indicate in which one of the following cases the court decided that the mother of an unborn child could not enter into an agreement on behalf of her child that the father of the child would not be responsible for paying maintenance for the child after the child's birth: [I ]Pinchin v Santam Insurance Co 1963 (2) SA 254 (W) [...