100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Case

PHI 413V Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis

Rating
-
Sold
1
Pages
5
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
09-02-2021
Written in
2020/2021

Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Patient’s Decision and Autonomy in Ethics It remains unclear, if James was included in the decision-making of his care. Before the decline of his health, he was fully healthy and capable to understand the extent of his illness and should his father truly make the decisions without any input from James, a disrespect to James’ autonomy would be very clear. Respect for autonomy is defined as “A principle that requires respect for the decision-making capacities of autonomous persons.” The consideration whether the decisions that would been made by James would be helpful or not, or if he is too young to take part of this process, is in questions but the exclusion from a bioethical standpoint makes Mike irresponsible. As stated by (Meilander, 2013 p 99), “Our task is not to judge the worth of this person’s life relative to other possible or actual lives. Our task is to care for the life he has as best we can.” As this is unrelated to James’ case and the disease process, Mike based his decisions solely on his faith and what he has witness from community members. Such decision-making brings disrespect to James as a person and his autonomy. The physician should not allow Mike to make the decision of treatment solely by himself and rather include James to prevent the violation of patient autonomy.

Show more Read less

Content preview

Running head: Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Grand Canyon University: PHI 413V
Date1 BENCHMARK – PATIENT’S SPIRITUAL NEEDS
Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis
Patient’s Decision and Autonomy in Ethics It remains unclear, if James was included in the decision-making of his care. Before the decline of his health, he was fully healthy and capable to understand the extent of his illness and should his father truly make the decisions without any input from James, a disrespect to James’ autonomy would be very clear. Respect for autonomy is defined as “A principle that requires respect for the decision-making capacities of autonomous persons.” The consideration whether the decisions that would been made by James would be helpful or not, or if he is too young to take part of this process, is in questions but the exclusion from a bioethical standpoint makes Mike irresponsible. As stated by (Meilander, 2013 p 99), “Our task is not to judge the worth of this person’s life relative to other possible or actual lives. Our task is to care for the life he has as best we can.” As this is unrelated to James’ case and the disease process, Mike based his decisions solely on his faith and what he has witness from community members. Such decision-
making brings disrespect to James as a person and his autonomy. The physician should not allow
Mike to make the decision of treatment solely by himself and rather include James to prevent the
violation of patient autonomy. Ethical Decision Making and Patient Autonomy Sickness in the eyes of Christians should be seen as a way of God to work through them. Jesus replies “. Neither this man nor his parents sinned," said Jesus, "but this happened so that the works of God might be displayed in him.”’ Ministers and healthcare workers are those, who receive a special call to care for the needy around us as part of their vacation in order to achieve a state of “shalom”. As stated by (Shelly & Miller, 2012 pp 141-142) “He gives to the sufferer the dignity of being united with him in his own suffering, and he gives to all of us the duty of 2

Document information

Uploaded on
February 9, 2021
Number of pages
5
Written in
2020/2021
Type
CASE
Professor(s)
N\\a
Grade
A+

Subjects

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
TESTSOURCE Chamberlain College Of Nursing
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
524
Member since
5 year
Number of followers
485
Documents
1536
Last sold
4 months ago
STUDY GUIDES/EXAMS AND NOTES ALL VERIFIED BY EXPERTS TO GUARANTEE AN EXCELLENT SCORE

All my uploaded documents, exams and essays are verified by relevant experts. I can assure an A or at least 90%. If any of my documents will not meet your standard, kindly message me and I shall have a solution to rectify the same.

3.5

94 reviews

5
36
4
12
3
25
2
7
1
14

Trending documents

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions