,2026/2027
July Bar Multistate Bar Examination
(MBE) 2026/2027 Comprehensive
Review Manual Advanced Exam
Preparation and Study Companion:
Comprehensive Review Modules,
Complete Test Bank, Updated
Practice Tests, and Final Readiness
Assessment
Question 16
Question 1
A buyer orders 500 blue chairs. The seller promptly ships 500 red chairs and sends a
notice stating that the shipment is offered only as an accommodation because blue
chairs are unavailable. What is the legal effect?
A. The shipment is an acceptance and a breach
B. The shipment is a counteroffer that the buyer may accept or reject
C. The original offer is automatically revoked
D. The buyer must accept the shipment and sue for damages
Correct Answer: B. The shipment is a counteroffer that the buyer may accept or
reject.
Rationale: Under the UCC, a prompt shipment of nonconforming goods ordinarily
constitutes both acceptance and breach. However, when the seller seasonably notifies
the buyer that the nonconforming goods are being sent only as an accommodation, the
shipment is treated as a counteroffer. The buyer may accept or reject the shipment.
Question 2
A plaintiff brings a federal employment-discrimination claim against an employer.
The plaintiff also asserts a state-law emotional-distress claim arising from the same
workplace investigation. The parties are not diverse. Which principle most strongly
supports the federal court’s authority to hear the state-law claim?
,2026/2027
A. The state claim independently presents a federal question
B. The state claim and federal claim form part of the same case or controversy
C. The plaintiff may combine any state claim with a federal claim
D. The court must exercise jurisdiction whenever the claims involve the same parties
Correct Answer: B. The state claim and federal claim form part of the same case
or controversy.
Rationale: Supplemental jurisdiction generally exists when a federal court has
original jurisdiction over at least one claim and the additional claim arises from the
same common nucleus of operative fact. Here, both claims concern the same
workplace investigation. Supplemental jurisdiction is not automatically available for
every claim involving the same parties, and the court may decline to exercise it in
appropriate circumstances.
Question 3
A defendant is properly served with a complaint but fails to answer or otherwise
defend within the required time. The plaintiff submits an affidavit establishing the
failure. What is the appropriate initial procedural step?
A. The clerk enters the defendant’s default
B. The judge immediately conducts a jury trial on liability
C. The plaintiff automatically receives the damages demanded
D. The complaint is dismissed for failure to prosecute
Correct Answer: A. The clerk enters the defendant’s default.
Rationale: Entry of default formally records that a party has failed to plead or
otherwise defend. It ordinarily occurs before a default judgment. Default generally
establishes the well-pleaded allegations concerning liability but does not
automatically establish uncertain damages. A jury trial is not immediately required.
Question 4
A state requires applicants for positions involving formulation of public policy to be
United States citizens. A lawful permanent resident challenges the requirement under
equal protection. Which standard is most likely to apply?
A. Strict scrutiny because every alienage classification is suspect
B. Rational basis review under the governmental-function exception
C. Intermediate scrutiny because alienage is quasi-suspect
D. No constitutional review because public employment is a privilege
, 2026/2027
Correct Answer: B. Rational basis review under the governmental-function
exception.
Rationale: State alienage classifications ordinarily receive strict scrutiny. However,
rational basis review applies when the position is closely connected to democratic
self-government, including certain policymaking positions. Intermediate scrutiny is
not the general standard for alienage classifications, and public employment remains
subject to constitutional review.
Question 5
A homeowner sues a general contractor for defective construction. The contractor
alleges that any liability resulted from the roofing subcontractor’s improper work.
Which procedural action may the contractor properly take?
A. Implead the subcontractor because the subcontractor may be liable for part of the
contractor’s liability
B. Add the subcontractor solely because the subcontractor knows relevant facts
C. File a crossclaim against the subcontractor even though the subcontractor is not a
party
D. Require the homeowner to amend the complaint to name the subcontractor
Correct Answer: A. Implead the subcontractor because the subcontractor may
be liable for part of the contractor’s liability.
Rationale: Impleader allows a defending party to bring in a nonparty who may be
derivatively liable for all or part of the defendant’s liability to the plaintiff. Indemnity
and contribution are common examples. A crossclaim applies only between existing
coparties, and mere knowledge of relevant facts is insufficient for impleader.
Question 6
A private citizen seeks monetary damages from a state in federal court for an alleged
violation of state law. The state has not consented to suit, and Congress has not
validly abrogated immunity. What is the most likely result?
A. The suit proceeds because federal courts have diversity jurisdiction
B. The suit is barred by state sovereign immunity
C. The suit proceeds if the damages are less than $75,000
D. The Eleventh Amendment applies only to suits brought by another state
Correct Answer: B. The suit is barred by state sovereign immunity.
Rationale: State sovereign immunity generally prevents private parties from suing an
unconsenting state for damages in federal court. Diversity jurisdiction does not