BLAW 3201 LSU Fry Test 1 Case
Studies and Mark Fry Test 2 Cases
Questions And Answers 2025-2026
Updated.
Ryan vs. Friesenhahn
Plaintiff-
Defendant- - Answer Plaintiff- Ryan Family
Defendant- Friesenhahn Family
Ryan vs. Friesenhahn
The summary judgement was reversed and case remanded to the trial court
Appeal- - Answer Ryan Family
Ryan vs. Friesenhahn
Decision - Answer In favor of Ryan family, Friesenhahn's were aware of the minors
consuming alcohol which made them liable
Mims vs. Arrow Financial Services, LLC
Plaintiff
Defendant - Answer Plaintiff- Marcus D. Mims
Defendant- Arrow Financial Services, LLC
Mims vs. Arrow Financial Services, LLC
judgement was reversed in favor of the Mims, was a federal law case
Appeal- - Answer Marcus Mims
Mims vs. Arrow Financial Services, LLC
Decision - Answer in favor of the mims, mims had the ability to hold the case in federal court
under the TCPA
, Defendant- Audi, world- wide volkswage, seaway
World-Wide Volkswagen vs. Woodson
Supreme court of Oklahoma held personal jurisdiction over petitions was authorized by
Oklahoma "long-arm" statute
Appeal- - Answer Audi, world-wide volkswagen, seaway
World-Wide Volkswagen vs. Woodson
Decision - Answer supreme court rules that the defendants had no "contact, ties or
relations" with the state of Oklahoma (where the accident occurred)
Judgement of Supreme Court was reversed to that
Shirley Parker vs. 20th century fox
plaintiff
defendant - Answer plaintiff- shirley parker
defendant- 20th century fox
Shirley Parker vs. 20th century fox
plaintiff moved for summary judgment motion was granted in plaintiffs favor
appeal- - Answer 20th century fox
Shirley Parker vs. 20th century fox
decision - Answer judgement affirmed- in favor of shirley parker; ruled that although the
employment period and payment for a different film were the same, they were inherently
different and therefore the contract was void
Fox vs. Mountain West Electric, Inc
plaintiff
defendant - Answer plaintiff- fox
defendant- mountain west electric inc
Fox vs. Mountain West Electric, Inc
Studies and Mark Fry Test 2 Cases
Questions And Answers 2025-2026
Updated.
Ryan vs. Friesenhahn
Plaintiff-
Defendant- - Answer Plaintiff- Ryan Family
Defendant- Friesenhahn Family
Ryan vs. Friesenhahn
The summary judgement was reversed and case remanded to the trial court
Appeal- - Answer Ryan Family
Ryan vs. Friesenhahn
Decision - Answer In favor of Ryan family, Friesenhahn's were aware of the minors
consuming alcohol which made them liable
Mims vs. Arrow Financial Services, LLC
Plaintiff
Defendant - Answer Plaintiff- Marcus D. Mims
Defendant- Arrow Financial Services, LLC
Mims vs. Arrow Financial Services, LLC
judgement was reversed in favor of the Mims, was a federal law case
Appeal- - Answer Marcus Mims
Mims vs. Arrow Financial Services, LLC
Decision - Answer in favor of the mims, mims had the ability to hold the case in federal court
under the TCPA
, Defendant- Audi, world- wide volkswage, seaway
World-Wide Volkswagen vs. Woodson
Supreme court of Oklahoma held personal jurisdiction over petitions was authorized by
Oklahoma "long-arm" statute
Appeal- - Answer Audi, world-wide volkswagen, seaway
World-Wide Volkswagen vs. Woodson
Decision - Answer supreme court rules that the defendants had no "contact, ties or
relations" with the state of Oklahoma (where the accident occurred)
Judgement of Supreme Court was reversed to that
Shirley Parker vs. 20th century fox
plaintiff
defendant - Answer plaintiff- shirley parker
defendant- 20th century fox
Shirley Parker vs. 20th century fox
plaintiff moved for summary judgment motion was granted in plaintiffs favor
appeal- - Answer 20th century fox
Shirley Parker vs. 20th century fox
decision - Answer judgement affirmed- in favor of shirley parker; ruled that although the
employment period and payment for a different film were the same, they were inherently
different and therefore the contract was void
Fox vs. Mountain West Electric, Inc
plaintiff
defendant - Answer plaintiff- fox
defendant- mountain west electric inc
Fox vs. Mountain West Electric, Inc
