Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 10 pages
Exam (elaborations)

PHIL 120 Exam 3 (PHIL 120) | 2025/2026 | 80+ Verified Q&A on Abortion Ethics, Speciesism, Just War Theory

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 10 pages

This document contains 80+ professionally verified and graded A+ exam questions with answers for PHIL 120 (Introduction to Philosophy), focused on Exam 3 at the University of Illinois, for the 2025/2026 academic year. It covers central applied ethics topics in a structured, concise format ideal for undergraduate students preparing for philosophy midterms or finals. Topics covered include: Moral obligations and utilitarian ethics, such as the distinction between charity and duty, marginal utility, and moral significance Peter Singer’s arguments on global poverty and our duty to prevent suffering when possible without sacrificing comparable moral importance Abortion ethics, with in-depth analysis of the “Future Like Ours” argument and Judith Jarvis Thomson’s analogies (Violinist, Growing Child, People Seeds) concerning bodily autonomy, the right to life, and justified killing Speciesism and animal rights, including critiques of factory farming, the moral relevance of suffering, and comparisons to racism and slavery Just War Theory, detailing the principles of Jus ad Bellum and Jus in Bello: competent authority, just cause, right intention, proportionality, necessity, and discrimination between combatants and civilians Deontological foundations for ethical reasoning, particularly as they relate to rights, justice, and the wrongness of killing This exam prep resource is ideal for: Philosophy students preparing for exams or essays on ethics, animal rights, or war Pre-law, political science, or international relations majors studying moral justification for state violence or military intervention Ethics instructors seeking structured questions and concise ethical theory application Anyone seeking applied philosophy examples in real-world contexts such as abortion, war, poverty, and animal welfare The Q&A format breaks down complex theories into digestible parts while preserving philosophical rigor and terminology aligned with university-level standards. Keywords: abortion ethics, future like ours, speciesism, Peter Singer, moral obligation, marginal utility, Judith Jarvis Thomson, violinist analogy, animal rights, factory farming, Just War Theory, jus ad bellum, jus in bello, proportionality, right intention, ethical killing, deontology, PHIL 120 exam

Content preview

Phil 120 Exam 3 2025/2026 Exam
Questions and Verified Answers |
Already Graded A+



Duty vs. Charity - 🧠ANSWER ✔✔-Along with a lack of excuses, it should be

seen as obligatory

-Distinction usually shaped from needs within our own society

Obligation to prevent suffering, where doing so does not require sacrifice of

comparable importance - 🧠ANSWER ✔✔-If it is in our power to prevent

something bad from happening (and we do not have to sacrifice something

of similar importance) we ought to do it

, Obligation to give excess money away - 🧠ANSWER ✔✔-No one can give

too much until their own margin of utility is equal to that of those they are

giving to

giving to point of Marginal utility vs. point of something of moral significance

- 🧠ANSWER ✔✔-Give until we must sacrifice something of moral

significance

-Results of everyone giving more than they ought cannot be worse than the

results of everyone giving less than they ought

-The goal of utilitarianism is to increase happiness over misery


Wrongness of killing - 🧠ANSWER ✔✔-Wrongness of killing does not rest on

being biologically humans

-Wrongness of killing could extend to some non-human mammals who

could be said to have futures

-Get to natural property of human being (namely, having a future) that

makes killing wrong

-Fulfills intuitions

Document information

Uploaded on
December 4, 2025
Number of pages
10
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
$15.99

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
JOSHCLAY
3.5
(85)
Sold
394
Followers
15
Items
20623
Last sold
1 day ago




Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions