• Wrong document? Swap it for free
  • Written by students who passed
  • Immediately available after payment
  • Read online or as PDF
Sell
Where do you study
Your language
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 1 out of 4 pages
Exam (elaborations)

Phil 201 Week 4 Quiz test 2021 liberty university

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 1 out of 4 pages

Phil 201 Week 4 Quiz test 2021 liberty university Question 1 3 out of 3 points My belief is a justified belief if and only if it is, in fact, a true belief. Question 2 3 out of 3 points If an individual is an externalist in terms of epistemic warrant, then that person thinks that Question 3 3 out of 3 points While Clifford’s form of evidentialism may have its difficulties, most contemporary epistemologists agree that it is, at the very least, not a self-defeating position, and this is part of what makes it a good option for epistemic justification. Question 4 3 out of 3 points Those holding to some form of externalism in rationality tend to argue that, since it is impossible for persons to have any cognitive access to the reasons and evidence that support some of a person’s beliefs, internalists cannot be right with respect to their account of justification for all beliefs. Question 5 3 out of 3 points Externalism in epistemology is an approach to rationality which argues that Question 6 0 out of 3 points The internalist in terms of epistemic justification thinks that Question 7 3 out of 3 points Humility helps us fight against intellectual vices like pride and vanity that keep us from seeing the truth. Question 8 3 out of 3 points For Aristotle, the “Golden Mean” points to fixed and universal ethical norms for all people to follow. Question 9 3 out of 3 points Virtue epistemology generally focuses on being intellectually virtuous as opposed to being absolutely certain. Question 10 3 out of 3 points Which is not one of the ways that Wood says moral and intellectual virtues parallel each other? Question 11 3 out of 3 points Epistemic humility means the same thing that it means when applied to moral issues and questions. Question 12 3 out of 3 points Discussions of vice and virtues tend to arise within which major area of philosophy? Question 13 3 out of 3 points What is the point of Descartes' evil demon argument? Question 14 3 out of 3 points One of the factors that fuels skepticism is our inability to demonstrate epistemic certainty about many of the beliefs we think are true. Question 15 3 out of 3 points Rather than having certainty about our beliefs, it is more likely that we have varying degrees of rational support for our beliefs. Question 16 3 out of 3 points To say that it is impossible to have knowledge is itself a claim to knowledge, and is for that reason a self-defeating assertion. Question 17 3 out of 3 points When the used car salesman tells Steve that the particular car he is considering purchasing has less than fifteen thousand actual miles on it, Steve is, quite naturally, a bit skeptical about this claim, particularly since the car is over ten years old and looks a little worse for wear.  In exhibiting this level of doubt, Steve is expressing: Question 18 3 out of 3 points If skepticism is an indefensible philosophical position to hold, then by the process of elimination, epistemic certainty is the only reasonable alternative. Question 19 3 out of 3 points Rene Descartes was a: Question 20 3 out of 3 points According to externalism, there is really no way to test if one’s memories are reliable, but, in the absence of defeaters, one is reasonable in holding that they are. Question 21 3 out of 3 points By "high accessibility requirements" the internalist means:  Question 22 3 out of 3 points A major criticism that internalism raises against externalism is: Question 23 3 out of 3 points Karen says she doesn’t believe that you can ever have real knowledge.  When asked if she claims to know that as a fact, she says no, but she believes that is the case.  What category would you place her in: Question 24 3 out of 3 points To say that a belief is defeasible is to say; Question 25 Needs Grading Explain the logical problem with W. K. Clifford’s belief that “It is wrong always, everywhere and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence."


Document information

Uploaded on
February 8, 2021
Number of pages
4
Written in
2020/2021
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Unknown
$16.49

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
smartzone
3.6
(625)
Sold
3455
Followers
2298
Items
14887
Last sold
1 day ago




Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions

Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.