Florida Civic Literacy (FCLE) EXAM
QUESTIONS WITH CORRECT
ANSWERS
ThisUcaseUestablishesUtheUSupremeUCourt'sUpowerUofUJudicialUReviewU-
UCORRECTUANSWERSMarburyUv.UMadison
SeparateUbutUequal"UdoctrineUsupremeUcourtUupheldUtheUconstitutionallyUofUjimUcrowUlaws▪argue
dUinUcourtUthatUtheUActUviolatedUtheU13thUandU14thUAmendmentsU-
UCORRECTUANSWERSPlessyUv.UFerguson
(1973)UlegalizedUabortionUonUtheUbasisUofUaUwoman'sUrightUtoUprivacy,UviolatedUtheUguaranteeUofU
personalUlibertyUandUtheUrightUtoUprivacyUimplicitlyUguaranteedUinUtheUFirst,UFourth,UFifth,UNinth,U
andU14thUAmendmentsU-UCORRECTUANSWERSRoeUv.UWade
EstablishedUtheUexclusionaryUruleUwasUapplicableUtoUtheUstatesU(evidenceUseizedUillegallyUcannotU
beUusedUinUcourt)▪ViolationUofUtheU4thUamendmentU-UCORRECTUANSWERSMappUv.UOhio
TheUcaseUthatUruledUthatUslavesUwereUpropertyUandUcouldUnotUsue▪ViolatedUtheU5thUamendment,U
helpedUbringUonUtheUcivilUwarU-UCORRECTUANSWERSDredUScottUv.USanford
SchoolUnewspapersUcanUbeUcensoredUbyUteachersUandUadministrators.UTheUjournalismUstudentsUf
eltUthatUthisUcensorshipUwasUaUdirectUviolationUofUtheirUFirstUAmendmentUrights.UTheUSupremeUCo
urtUdecidedUthatUPrincipalUReynoldsUhadUtheUrightUtoUsuchUeditorialUdecisions,UasUheUhadU"legitim
ateUpedagogicalUconcerns."U-UCORRECTUANSWERSHazelwoodUv.UKuhlmeier
1954UcaseUthatUoverturnedUSeparateUbutUEqualUstandardUofUdiscriminationUinUeducation.▪HerUfa
milyUbelievedUthatUtheUsegregatedUschoolUsystemUviolatedUtheU14thUAmendmentUandUtookUtheirU
caseUtoUcourt.U-UCORRECTUANSWERSBrownUv.UBoardUofUEducation
, MarylandUwasUtryingUtoUtaxUtheUnationalUbankUandUSupremeUCourtUruledUthatUfederalUlawUwasUstr
ongerUthanUtheUstateUlawU-UCORRECTUANSWERSMcCullochUv.UMaryland
AU1989UcaseUinUwhichUtheUSupremeUCourtUstruckUdownUaUlawUbanningUtheUburningUofUtheUAmeric
anUflagUonUtheUgroundsUthatUsuchUactionUwasUsymbolicUspeechUprotectedUbyUtheUFirstUAmendme
nt.U-UCORRECTUANSWERSTexasUv.UJohnson
U.S.USupremeUCourtUcaseUthatUlimitedUexecutiveUprivilegeU-
UCORRECTUANSWERSUnitedUStatesUv.UNixon
aUlandmarkUcaseUinUUnitedUStatesUSupremeUCourtUhistory.UInUtheUcase,UtheUSupremeUCourtUunani
mouslyUruledUthatUstateUcourtsUareUrequiredUunderUtheUSixthUAmendmentUofUtheUConstitutionUtoU
provideUcounselUinUcriminalUcasesUforUdefendantsUunableUtoUaffordUtheirUownUattorneys.U-
UCORRECTUANSWERSGideonUv.UWainwright
RegulatingUinterstateUcommerceUisUaUpowerUreservedUtoUtheUfederalUgovernmentU-
UCORRECTUANSWERSGibbonsUv.UOgden
SupremeUCourtUheldUthatUcriminalUsuspectsUmustUbeUinformedUofUtheirUrightUtoUconsultUwithUanUa
ttorneyUandUofUtheirUrightUagainstUself-
incriminationUpriorUtoUquestioningUbyUpolice.UViolatedUtheU5thUamendmentUandUhisU6th,UrightUtoU
anUattorney.UCaseUtopic:Uself-incrimination,UdueUprocessU-UCORRECTUANSWERSMirandaUv.UArizona
StudentsUhaveUtheUrightUtoUsymbolicUspeechUatUschoolUasUlongUasUitUisUnotUdisruptive,UprotectedUb
utUheU1stUamendmentU-UCORRECTUANSWERSTinkerUv.UDesUMoines
1944USupremeUCourtUcaseUwhereUtheUSupremeUCourtUupheldUtheUorderUprovidingUforUtheUrelocat
ionUofUJapaneseUAmericans.UItUwasUnotUuntilU1988UthatUCongressUformallyUapologizedUandUagreed
UtoUpayU$20,000U2UeachUsurvivor▪KorematsuUarguedUthatUExecutiveUOrderU9066UwasUunconstituti
onalUandUthatUitUviolatedUtheUFifthUAmendment.UTheUFifthUAmendmentwasUselectedUoverUtheUFo
QUESTIONS WITH CORRECT
ANSWERS
ThisUcaseUestablishesUtheUSupremeUCourt'sUpowerUofUJudicialUReviewU-
UCORRECTUANSWERSMarburyUv.UMadison
SeparateUbutUequal"UdoctrineUsupremeUcourtUupheldUtheUconstitutionallyUofUjimUcrowUlaws▪argue
dUinUcourtUthatUtheUActUviolatedUtheU13thUandU14thUAmendmentsU-
UCORRECTUANSWERSPlessyUv.UFerguson
(1973)UlegalizedUabortionUonUtheUbasisUofUaUwoman'sUrightUtoUprivacy,UviolatedUtheUguaranteeUofU
personalUlibertyUandUtheUrightUtoUprivacyUimplicitlyUguaranteedUinUtheUFirst,UFourth,UFifth,UNinth,U
andU14thUAmendmentsU-UCORRECTUANSWERSRoeUv.UWade
EstablishedUtheUexclusionaryUruleUwasUapplicableUtoUtheUstatesU(evidenceUseizedUillegallyUcannotU
beUusedUinUcourt)▪ViolationUofUtheU4thUamendmentU-UCORRECTUANSWERSMappUv.UOhio
TheUcaseUthatUruledUthatUslavesUwereUpropertyUandUcouldUnotUsue▪ViolatedUtheU5thUamendment,U
helpedUbringUonUtheUcivilUwarU-UCORRECTUANSWERSDredUScottUv.USanford
SchoolUnewspapersUcanUbeUcensoredUbyUteachersUandUadministrators.UTheUjournalismUstudentsUf
eltUthatUthisUcensorshipUwasUaUdirectUviolationUofUtheirUFirstUAmendmentUrights.UTheUSupremeUCo
urtUdecidedUthatUPrincipalUReynoldsUhadUtheUrightUtoUsuchUeditorialUdecisions,UasUheUhadU"legitim
ateUpedagogicalUconcerns."U-UCORRECTUANSWERSHazelwoodUv.UKuhlmeier
1954UcaseUthatUoverturnedUSeparateUbutUEqualUstandardUofUdiscriminationUinUeducation.▪HerUfa
milyUbelievedUthatUtheUsegregatedUschoolUsystemUviolatedUtheU14thUAmendmentUandUtookUtheirU
caseUtoUcourt.U-UCORRECTUANSWERSBrownUv.UBoardUofUEducation
, MarylandUwasUtryingUtoUtaxUtheUnationalUbankUandUSupremeUCourtUruledUthatUfederalUlawUwasUstr
ongerUthanUtheUstateUlawU-UCORRECTUANSWERSMcCullochUv.UMaryland
AU1989UcaseUinUwhichUtheUSupremeUCourtUstruckUdownUaUlawUbanningUtheUburningUofUtheUAmeric
anUflagUonUtheUgroundsUthatUsuchUactionUwasUsymbolicUspeechUprotectedUbyUtheUFirstUAmendme
nt.U-UCORRECTUANSWERSTexasUv.UJohnson
U.S.USupremeUCourtUcaseUthatUlimitedUexecutiveUprivilegeU-
UCORRECTUANSWERSUnitedUStatesUv.UNixon
aUlandmarkUcaseUinUUnitedUStatesUSupremeUCourtUhistory.UInUtheUcase,UtheUSupremeUCourtUunani
mouslyUruledUthatUstateUcourtsUareUrequiredUunderUtheUSixthUAmendmentUofUtheUConstitutionUtoU
provideUcounselUinUcriminalUcasesUforUdefendantsUunableUtoUaffordUtheirUownUattorneys.U-
UCORRECTUANSWERSGideonUv.UWainwright
RegulatingUinterstateUcommerceUisUaUpowerUreservedUtoUtheUfederalUgovernmentU-
UCORRECTUANSWERSGibbonsUv.UOgden
SupremeUCourtUheldUthatUcriminalUsuspectsUmustUbeUinformedUofUtheirUrightUtoUconsultUwithUanUa
ttorneyUandUofUtheirUrightUagainstUself-
incriminationUpriorUtoUquestioningUbyUpolice.UViolatedUtheU5thUamendmentUandUhisU6th,UrightUtoU
anUattorney.UCaseUtopic:Uself-incrimination,UdueUprocessU-UCORRECTUANSWERSMirandaUv.UArizona
StudentsUhaveUtheUrightUtoUsymbolicUspeechUatUschoolUasUlongUasUitUisUnotUdisruptive,UprotectedUb
utUheU1stUamendmentU-UCORRECTUANSWERSTinkerUv.UDesUMoines
1944USupremeUCourtUcaseUwhereUtheUSupremeUCourtUupheldUtheUorderUprovidingUforUtheUrelocat
ionUofUJapaneseUAmericans.UItUwasUnotUuntilU1988UthatUCongressUformallyUapologizedUandUagreed
UtoUpayU$20,000U2UeachUsurvivor▪KorematsuUarguedUthatUExecutiveUOrderU9066UwasUunconstituti
onalUandUthatUitUviolatedUtheUFifthUAmendment.UTheUFifthUAmendmentwasUselectedUoverUtheUFo