• Wrong document? Swap it for free
  • Written by students who passed
  • Immediately available after payment
  • Read online or as PDF
Sell
Where do you study
Your language
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 3 out of 18 pages
Exam (elaborations)

Case Notes Answers for SNEAKER 2013 by Richard Bliss Mark Potter

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 3 out of 18 pages

Case Notes Answers for SNEAKER 2013 by Richard Bliss Mark Potter Case Notes Answers for SNEAKER 2013 by Richard Bliss Mark Potter Case Notes Answers for SNEAKER 2013 by Richard Bliss Mark Potter

Content preview

Case Notes/Answers
SNEAKER 2013 by Richard Bliss Mark Potter
Discussion Questions:
Sneaker 2013: Assignment Questions
1. Should the following be included in Sneaker 2013’s capital budgeting cash flow
projection? Why or why not?
a. Building a factory and purchase/installation of the equipment
b. Research and development costs
c. Cannibalization of other sneaker sales
d. Interest costs
e. Changes in current asset/current liabilities accounts
f. Taxes
g. Cost of goods sold
h. Advertising and promotion expenses
i. Depreciation charges


2. Produce a projected capital budgeting cash flow statement for the Sneaker 2013
project by
answering the following:
a. What is the project’s initial (year 0) investment outlay?
b. What are the project’s annual (years 2013-2018) net operating cash flows?
c. What is the project’s terminal (2018) non-operating net cash flow?
d. Does Sneaker 2013 appear viable from a quantitative standpoint? To answer this
question, estimate the project’s payback, net present value, and internal rate of
return.

Persistence: Assignment Questions
1. Which cash flows should be incorporated into the project’s forecast? Why or why not?
2. Produce a projected capital budgeting cash flow statement for the Persistence project
by answering the following:
a. What is the project’s initial (year 0) investment outlay?
b. What are the project’s annual net operating cash flows?
c. What is the project’s terminal (2018) net cash flow?
3. Does Persistence appear attractive from a quantitative standpoint? To answer this
question, estimate the project’s payback, net present value, and internal rate of return.

Additional Assignment Questions
1. Which project do you think is more risky? How do you think you should incorporate
differences in risk into your analysis?
2. Based on the calculated payback period, net present value (NPV), and internal rate of
return (IRR) for each project, which project looks better for New Balance shareholders?
Why?
3. Should Rodriguez be more or less critical of cash flow forecasts for Persistence than of
cash flow forecasts for Sneaker 2013? Why?
4. What is your final recommendation to Rodriguez?

, BAB167
NOVEMBER 2014




Sneaker 2013
Teaching Note

Case Summary
This case provides a comprehensive introduction to the basics of capital budgeting. It presents
students with two distinct capital budgeting exercises revolving around the athletic footwear
industry. The first exercise is about a running sneaker with a large capital outlay and a six-year
project life. It contains many traditional project cash flows as well as a significant endorsement
risk. The second exercise involves evaluating a hiking shoe project with a smaller initial
investment in a more rapidly growing but unfamiliar market segment.

The authors have used this case with audiences including sophomore undergraduates, MBAs,
and seasoned executives. In the first two audiences, students build spreadsheet solutions from
the assumptions provided; for executives, we often give them the completed analysis and focus
more on interpretation of financial metrics and on qualitative discussion. We have also used one
or both of the exercises as exam questions.



Teaching and Learning Objectives
The case was developed with the following objectives:

 Introduce the basic concepts of capital budgeting, including cash flow calculation and
decision metrics.
 Determine the cash flows appropriate to consider for a potential project.
 Forecast a project’s cash flows.




1

, BAB167
NOVEMBER 2014
Sneaker 2013

 Evaluate a project using payback period, net present value (NPV), and internal rate of
return (IRR).
 Raise the issue of how to compare projects with unequal lives.
 Introduce different types of risk inherent in capital budgeting and how they are
incorporated into the analysis.

Providing two exercises gives students the opportunity to practice basic capital budgeting
techniques and instructors the flexibility to design a class around one or both projects.


Keywords: capital budgeting, business case, finance, project analysis, decision criteria, value
creation.


Teaching Plan
The case is flexible enough for use with a variety of audiences and time constraints. We start by
providing the menu of assignment questions and then go into some detail about how they might
be used most effectively depending on the audience and the time available.


Sneaker 2013: Assignment Questions


1. Should the following be included in Sneaker 2013’s capital budgeting cash flow projection?
Why or why not?
a. Building a factory and purchase/installation of the equipment
b. Research and development costs
c. Cannibalization of other sneaker sales
d. Interest costs
e. Changes in current asset/current liabilities accounts
f. Taxes
g. Cost of goods sold
h. Advertising and promotion expenses
i. Depreciation charges


2. Produce a projected capital budgeting cash flow statement for the Sneaker 2013 project by
answering the following:

a. What is the project’s initial (year 0) investment outlay?
b. What are the project’s annual (years 2013-2018) net operating cash flows?
c. What is the project’s terminal (2018) non-operating net cash flow?
d. Does Sneaker 2013 appear viable from a quantitative standpoint? To answer this
question, estimate the project’s payback, net present value, and internal rate of
return.


2

Document information

Uploaded on
November 13, 2025
Number of pages
18
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
$45.99

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
eDiscountShop
3.9
(7)
Sold
65
Followers
5
Items
984
Last sold
1 week ago



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions