• Wrong document? Swap it for free
  • Written by students who passed
  • Immediately available after payment
  • Read online or as PDF
Sell
Where do you study
Your language
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 3 out of 18 pages
Exam (elaborations)

Procurement Final Exam - Study Guide with Complete Solutions

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 3 out of 18 pages

Procurement Final Exam - Study Guide with Complete Solutions

Content preview

Procurement Final Exam - Study
Guide with Complete Solutions
-Strategic considerations - eg. US military preparedness.

-Government regulations - e.g. MWBE commitments.

-Single supplier's production capacity may be limited.

-Opportunity to test a new supplier with trial orders.

-Volatility in the supply market makes single sourcing unacceptably risky.

(Note: MWBE stands for Minority Women in Business).

12: Arguments in favor of Single Sourcing Strategy: - ANSWER--EXCLUSIVITY: The
supplier may be the sole source.
(patent protection, exclusive distributorship).

-Outstanding quality or service --> value

-Order too small to split.

-Opportunities for discounts or lower freight costs.

-May receive more attention if only one supplier involved.

-Set-up costs for duplicate suppliers would be prohibitive.

-Easier to schedule deliveries.

-JIT production or stockless buying arrangements.

-Prefer to focus attention on one, not multiple suppliers.

-Prerequisite to key partnering status.

12: Key questions for supplier selection and sourcing strategy: - ANSWER--Single
source or multiple sources?

-Short term or long term contracts?

-Buy direct from a manufacturer or through a distributor? (Sometimes you don't have a
choice)

,-Does supplier size matter - large, medium or small?

-Is geographical location a factor to consider?

-Utilize only domestic, or also foreign suppliers?

-Expect close working relationships or arm's length?

12: Level 1 Strategic Criteria: Supply Risks and Spend Categories: - ANSWER-For
better example go to slide 7.

12: Level 2 and 3 Traditional Criteria: Evaluation of Potential Supply Sources:

MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE AND FINANCIAL STABILITY: - ANSWER--Mission,
goals, planning, corporate culture, values.
-Organization structure and decision-making.

-Customer focused / quality focused

-Management controls, information systems, policies and procedures, e-commerce
capability

-Qualifications and background of key managers

-Financial condition (ex. annual reports, D&B's)

-Financial ratios (ex. liquidity, profitability, debt and activity)

12: Level 2 and 3 Traditional Criteria: Evaluation of Potential Supply Sources:

PRODUCTION PROCESS AND TECHNICAL CAPABILITY: - ANSWER--Previous
experience and accomplishments.

-Completed projects (talk to past customers).

-Utilization of quality processes and systems.

-Engineering, design and technical strengths.

-Capacity and flexibility to meet demand (lead time).

-Employee qualifications and capabilities.

-ISO 9000 / ISO 14000 certifications.

, -Availability and quality of technical support.

-Evaluation of samples obtained from supplier.

-Visit to supplier's facility by cross-functional team.

12: Level 3 - 10 Potential Supplier Evaluation Criteria (R. Monczka):

1) MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY: - ANSWER--Does long range planning exist?
Mission / vision?

-Is turnover high among managers?

-Professional / educational background of key managers?

-Is management customer-focused?

-History or labor / management relations?

-Is management investing in the business and its people?

-Does management practice TQM and continuous improvement?

12: Level 3 - 10 Potential Supplier Evaluation Criteria (R. Monczka):

10) LONGER TERM RELATIONSHIP POTENTIAL: - ANSWER--Does the potential
exist to move beyond the traditional arms length purchasing relationship?

-How early in the design process is the supplier willing or able to participate?

-What is unique about the supplier's contributions?

-Is there an interest in joint problem solving and process improvement?

-Is there an atmosphere which promotes free and open communication?

-What is the commitment of both top managements?

12: Level 3 - 10 Potential Supplier Evaluation Criteria (R. Monczka):

2) EMPLOYEE CAPABILITIES: - ANSWER--Are employees committed to TQM and
continuous improvement?

-How are employee / management relations?

-Is employee morale high?

Document information

Uploaded on
September 26, 2025
Number of pages
18
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
$12.99

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
LUCKYSTAR2022
3.5
(163)
Sold
929
Followers
726
Items
9655
Last sold
2 days ago



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions