Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 7 pages
Exam (elaborations)

SUS1501 Assignment 2 2025 - Distinction Guaranteed _ UNISA

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 7 pages

This document contains the full solution for SUS1501 Assignment 2 (2025). The assignment evaluates the maxim “Elon Musk will take R12 billion every day for a year in order to get really, really rich” using Kant’s Categorical Imperative. It applies Kant’s tests of universal law and treating humanity as ends, not merely means, to assess the morality of extreme wealth accumulation. Key contents include: Evaluation of Elon Musk’s hypothetical earnings through Kantian ethics. Discussion on why the maxim fails the universalization test (contradiction in conception). Analysis of Kant’s likely stance on extreme personal enrichment. A reasoned opinion on the earnings of the six wealthiest South Africans, with a focus on inequality, fairness, democracy, and public policy. Ethical arguments grounded in Kant’s philosophy and South African socio-economic context.

Content preview

SUS1501
ASSIGNMENT 2
DUE DATE: 22 AUGUST 2025

, SUS1501 ASSIGNMENT 2 2025

DUE 22 AUGUST 2025




I chose option “a. Good for him – he is brilliant and worked hard to earn this.” this is
confirmed in MY quiz attempt.



EVALUATE USING KANT'S CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE



Maxim (given in the assignment):



“Elon Musk will take R12 billion every day for a year in order to get really, really rich.”



Universal law (given):

“All people (8.1 billion of them) will take R12 billion every day for a year in order to get
really, really rich.”



Is the maxim above conceivable in a world ruled by the universal law?



No. If everyone acted on this maxim, the situation it creates is impossible and
selfdefeating. If every person took R12 billion every day, money would lose its ordinary
meaning (prices, wages and stores of value would break down because ‘everyone’
would try to grab vast sums), markets would collapse, and social and economic systems
would fail. The maxim cannot be conceived as a stable rule for a world because the

Connected book
 image
Anita M. Superson The Moral Skeptic
Publisher: 2009 ISBN: 9780199704118 Edition: Unknown

Document information

Uploaded on
August 21, 2025
Number of pages
7
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
$3.22

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
UNIVIA
4.3
(48)
Sold
516
Followers
3
Items
766
Last sold
6 hours ago



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions