• Wrong document? Swap it for free
  • Written by students who passed
  • Immediately available after payment
  • Read online or as PDF
Sell
Where do you study
Your language
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 5 pages
Exam (elaborations)

COMM 325 Chapter 10 || Zero Flaw on Answers.

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 5 pages

Arguing from accepted belief correct answers Argument based on an accepted belief, assumption, or propositition Arguing from analogy correct answers Argument based on common characteristics of two people, places, objects, proposals, or ideas shared. Arguing from cause-effect correct answers An argument that attempts to establish a causal relationship. Arguing from condition correct answers An argument based on the assertion that if something does or does not happen, something else will or will not happen. Arguing from example correct answers An argument based on a sampling of given class of people, places, or things. Arguing from facts correct answers An argument based on a conclusion that best explains a body of facts. Arguing from two choices correct answers Arguing that there are only two possible proposals or courses of action and then eliminating one of the choices. Attitudes correct answers Relatively enduring combinations of beliefs that predispose people to respond in particular ways to persons, organizations, places, ideas, and issues. Balance or consistency theory correct answers A theory based on the belief that human beings strive for a harmonious existence with self and others and experience psychological discomfort (dissonance) when they do not.

Content preview

COMM 325 Chapter 10 || Zero Flaw on Answers.


Arguing from accepted belief correct answers Argument based on an accepted belief,
assumption, or propositition


Arguing from analogy correct answers Argument based on common characteristics of two
people, places, objects, proposals, or ideas shared.


Arguing from cause-effect correct answers An argument that attempts to establish a causal
relationship.


Arguing from condition correct answers An argument based on the assertion that if something
does or does not happen, something else will or will not happen.


Arguing from example correct answers An argument based on a sampling of given class of
people, places, or things.


Arguing from facts correct answers An argument based on a conclusion that best explains a body
of facts.


Arguing from two choices correct answers Arguing that there are only two possible proposals or
courses of action and then eliminating one of the choices.


Attitudes correct answers Relatively enduring combinations of beliefs that predispose people to
respond in particular ways to persons, organizations, places, ideas, and issues.


Balance or consistency theory correct answers A theory based on the belief that human beings
strive for a harmonious existence with self and others and experience psychological discomfort
(dissonance) when they do not.

, Bandwagon tactic correct answers A tactic that urges a person to follow the crowd, to do what
everyone else is doing.


Beliefs correct answers The trust or confidence placed in social, political, historic, economic, and
religious claims.


Closed-minded or authoritarian interviewee correct answers Parties with unchangeable central
beliefs who rely on trusted authorities when making decisions.


Cold calls correct answers Persuasive interview contacts made without an appointment or prior
notice.


Consubstantiality correct answers The effort to establish a substantial sameness or similarity
between interviewer and interviewee.


Contrast principle correct answers If a second item or choice is fairly different from the first, it
seems more different than it actually is.


Culture correct answers Shared customs, norms, knowledge, attitudes, values, and traits of a
racial, religious, social, or corporate group.


Differentiation correct answers An attempt through language to alter how a person sees reality by
renaming it.


Domino effect/Thin entering wedge/Slippery slope tactic correct answers An argument that one
decision, action, or law after another is leading inevitably toward some sort of danger.


Evidence correct answers Examples, stories, comparisons, testimony, and statistics that support a
claim.

Document information

Uploaded on
July 22, 2025
Number of pages
5
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
$10.99

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
SirAnton
3.7
(118)
Sold
807
Followers
438
Items
40071
Last sold
6 days ago




Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions