Weeks v. US (1914) -
Answer✓✓
Exclusionary rule
- warrantless seizure of items from private residence violates 4th Amendment
_____________Quiz____________?
Terry v. Ohio (1968) -
Answer✓✓
"Stop and Frisk"
police may:
- stop a person if they have reasonable suspicion that the person committed, or is about to
commit, a crime
- frisk the suspect for weapons if they have reasonable suspicion that the person is armed
and dangerous
_____________Quiz____________?
Reasonable Suspicion -
Answer✓✓
a suspicion based on specific facts, training, and experience; less than probable cause
1
, _____________Quiz____________?
Probable cause to arrest -
Answer✓✓
facts and circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to believe that a crime has
been committed and a particular person has committed it
_____________Quiz____________?
Probable cause to search -
Answer✓✓
facts and circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to believe that a
evidence/property is located in a particular place to be searched
_____________Quiz____________?
frisk -
Answer✓✓
an over-the-clothes pat-down or minimal search by police to discover weapons
_____________Quiz____________?
Chimel v. California (1969) - "Chimel Rule" -
Answer✓✓
arresting officers are limited to searches within the immediate vicinity/control of the suspect
being arrested; any other search requires warrant
_____________Quiz____________?
Mapp v. Ohio (1961) -
Answer✓✓
Extended the Exclusionary Rule to the states
_____________Quiz____________?
2
, Carroll v. U.S. (1925) - "Carroll Doctrine" -
Answer✓✓
Automobile exception
- warrantless search of a car does not violate 4th Amendment, if there is PC to believe
evidence a crime is present in vehicle, and exigent circumstances exist to believe vehicle
could be moved before warrant is obtained
_____________Quiz____________?
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) -
Answer✓✓
Right to counsel
- extended right to counsel during criminal trial to the states
_____________Quiz____________?
Escobedo v. Illinois (1964) -
Answer✓✓
Right to counsel
- criminal suspects have a right to counsel during police interrogations
_____________Quiz____________?
Miranda v. Arizona (1966) - "Miranda Warning" -
Answer✓✓
law enforcement required to give formal warning advising criminal suspects in custody of
their rights, before interrogation
_____________Quiz____________?
In re Gault (1967) -
Answer✓✓
Due process
3
, - 14th Amendment Due Process Clause applies to juveniles
_____________Quiz____________?
In re Winship (1970) -
Answer✓✓
Due process
- established burden of "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" as standard in all federal and
state cases
- removed "preponderance of evidence" standard previously used in juvenile delinquency
proceedings
_____________Quiz____________?
Roper v. Simmons (2005) -
Answer✓✓
unconstitutional to impose capital punishment for crimes committed while under 18
_____________Quiz____________?
Atkins v. Virginia (2002) -
Answer✓✓
unconstitutional to impose capital punishment on people with intellectual disabilities
_____________Quiz____________?
Tennessee v. Garner (1985) -
Answer✓✓
Deadly force may not be used against an unarmed and fleeing suspect unless necessary to
prevent the escape and unless the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect
poses a significant threat of death or serious injury to the officers or others
_____________Quiz____________?
Graham v. Connor (1989) -
4