• Wrong document? Swap it for free
  • Written by students who passed
  • Immediately available after payment
  • Read online or as PDF
Sell
Where do you study
Your language
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 1 out of 2 pages
Summary

Summary Burger 2009

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 1 out of 2 pages

Summary of Burger's study as a replication of Milgram

Content preview

Burger 2009 - Contemporary Study
Facts:
Other differences:
It was a variation of Milgram’s
70 adults = 29 male and 41 female
experiment carried out by Jerry Burger.
Aged 20-81
Partial replication but more ethical.
55% Caucasian
Variation 5 had a ‘heart condition’ on the
4% Black Afro-American
script.
60% had Uni degrees
Variation 7 the 2nd teacher (confederate)
Max voltage was 150v which in
encourages the main participant to stop.
Milgram’s one was seen as the point of
Burger incorporates both of these into his
no return.
study.


Locus of Control:
He wanted to investigate empath and
The degree to which people believe
locus of control on people in society.
that they, as opposed to external
Locus of control is the ability to have
forces, have control over the
control and say over your own life and
outcome of events in their lives.
decisions. He used a self questionnaire
The concept was developed by
for participants to assess these traits.
Julian B. Rotter in 1954.


Procedure: Findings:
There was a 2 step screening process first 70% pressed the 150v button compared
to see if participants could handle a lot of with Milgram’s 82.5% in experiment 5.
stress. There was no significant difference in
Participants were warned 3 times in obedience rates between men and women,
writing that they could withdraw at any although women were slightly more likely
point and keep the $50. to press the 150v button.
The experimenter was a clinical The defiant participants did have a
psychologist. significantly higher desire for personal
The ‘test shock’ was at 15v rather than control scores than obedient participants.
45v like Milgram.
No time passed between the introduction Conclusion:
and the debrief. Milgram’s findings are not era-bound
A clinical psychologist supervised all the nor are they androcentric.
trials. Lack of empathy does not seem to
Self-reporting questionnaires were used to explain high obedience rates.
measure empathic concern and desire for Desire of control seems to determine
personal control. defiance.

Document information

Study Level
Subject
Uploaded on
June 12, 2025
Number of pages
2
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Summary
$5.42

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Sold
0
Followers
0
Items
92
Last sold
-




Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions