WGU D265 Critical Thinking Reason and
Evidence Exam 2025
A person is shopping for a new suit. A suit that was originally sold for $1,000 was on
sale for $400. Believing this deal was too good to pass up, the buyer purchased the suit,
even though they had planned on only spending $300 What cognitive bias did the buyer
exhibit? - -Anchoring and Adjusting
The buyer first becomes anchored to the original price ($1,000). Because the suit was
being sold for only $400 (adjusting)
You should only buy used cars because new cars are expensive and often lose the
value the moment you drive it off the lot. So, who wouldn't want to save money. What is
the conclusion of the given argument? - -You should only buy used cars
(who wouldn't want to save money) is actually not a proposition. So it is not a part of the
argument.
Amanda would probably be a great boss because she was born on a Tuesday. Which
descriptor best describes this? - -An inference
A conclusion reached on the basis of evidence and reasoning.
Which sentence is a simple proposition? - -WGU is an online school.
An individual statement that can be true or false.
Whenever I smell hamburgers on the grill, it usually means my neighbor is hosting a
party. I am currently smelling hamburgers, so he is hosting a party. Which term best
describes this argument? - -Inductive
Inductive arguments intend to make their conclusions possible.
Abraham Lincoln was 9 feet tall. Which descriptor accurately characterizes this
sentence? - -Statement
A sentence that can be true or false.
She has eaten lunch every day at noon for 45 years. Therefore, she will eat lunch
tomorrow at noon as well. Which term best describes this argument? - -Strong
Arguments, whose conclusion is a claim about the future, where it is made based on the
way things have typically happened in the past, are inductive. Even if the experience
provides us a good basis for making predictions, the future is not fully knowable and can
always surprise us.
All dogs have fleas. Molly is a dog. So, Molly has fleas. Which term best describes the
argument? - -Deductive
Deductive arguments intend to make a claim 100% guaranteed.
WGU D265
, WGU D265
Paper is flammable because paper burns. What type of logic error is this an example
of? - -Begging the question.
A circular argument in which the premise of an argument assumes the truth of the
conclusion.
Most WGU students take out student loans. You are a WGU student. Therefore, you
probably took out a student loan. Which set of terms classify this argument? - -Strong
and cogent.
Inductive arguments can be intending to present probably conclusions. Suggesting that
you probably took out a loan, makes this argument inductive. Inductive arguments are
strong. The words valid, sound, and unsound only apply to deductive arguments. Since
the premises are actually true the argument is cogent. The argument is also strong
because it's structure is still good.
When asked if she thought banning guns would make our schools safer, Maria
suggested that we should also increase funding for school counselors. Because Maria
committed the red herring fallacy, it is clear that banning guns will not make our schools
safer. Which type of logic error is this an example of? - -The fallacy fallacy.
When someone uses the fact that a fallacy was committed to justify rejecting the
conclusion of an argument.
If you have a Ferrari, then you are popular. You are popular, so you must have a
Ferrari. This is an example of which type of logical error? - -Affirming the consequent.
The then clause is called the consequent. You are affirming the then-clause, which is
the consequent.
Which statement is accurate regarding bias in newspapers? - -All newspapers have
bias, but some are more credible than others.
Critical thinking perspective teaches that while all sources have bias, some are more
credible than others.
What statement is most accurate regarding the credibility of information sources? - -
Sources that apologize for mistakes are more likely credible than those that do not.
Sources that consider the possibility that their assessment is wrong, consider the other
side fairly, and/or consider counter arguments to their analysis are more likely to be
credible than sources that insist they are correct.
Before trusting a source, Josue takes time to identify the author. Why is this important?
- -It helps Josue determine if the author has relevant expertise.
What should a critical thinker do if they are uncertain about the reliability of a source? - -
They should cross-reference the source with additional source materials.
Critical thinking perspective never suggests for us to personally verify every source.
WGU D265