• Wrong document? Swap it for free
  • Written by students who passed
  • Immediately available after payment
  • Read online or as PDF
Sell
Where do you study
Your language
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 14 pages
Exam (elaborations)

FL BAR EXAM- TORTS VS CRIMES Questions And Correct Answers.

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 14 pages

Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress - Answer i) an act by the ∆ amounting to extreme and outrageous conduct; ii) intent on part of the ∆ to cause the π to suffer severe emotion distress OR recklessness as to the effect of the ∆'s conduct; iii) causation; iv) and damages in the form of severe emotional distress Do NOT need to show physical impact or physical manifestation, but severe emotional distress = more than a reasonable person could be expected to endure Battery (Tort) - Answer i) an act by the ∆ the brings about harmful or offensive contact to the π's person; ii) intent on the part of the ∆ to bring about such harmful or offensive contact; and iii) causation Harmful or offensive - judged by whether it would be harmful or offensive to a reasonable person of ordinary sensibilities. Nominal Damages okay. Assault (Tort) - Answer i) an act by ∆ creating a reasonable apprehension of imminent harmful or offensive contact to π's person; ii) intent by ∆ to cause π apprehension of harmful or offensive contact; and iii) causation Nominal damages okay. Words alone are never enough. False Imprisonment (Tort) - Answer i) an act or omission on the part of ∆ that confines or restrains the π to a bounded area; ii) intent on the part of the ∆ to confine or restrain π to the bounded area; iii) causation; iv) π is aware of the confinement

Content preview

FL BAR EXAM- TORTS VS CRIMES
Questions And Correct Answers.
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress - Answer i) an act by the ∆ amounting to extreme
and outrageous conduct;

ii) intent on part of the ∆ to cause the π to suffer severe emotion distress OR recklessness as to
the effect of the ∆'s conduct;

iii) causation;

iv) and damages in the form of severe emotional distress




Do NOT need to show physical impact or physical manifestation, but severe emotional distress =
more than a reasonable person could be expected to endure



Battery (Tort) - Answer i) an act by the ∆ the brings about harmful or offensive contact to the
π's person;

ii) intent on the part of the ∆ to bring about such harmful or offensive contact; and

iii) causation




Harmful or offensive - judged by whether it would be harmful or offensive to a reasonable
person of ordinary sensibilities.



Nominal Damages okay.



Assault (Tort) - Answer i) an act by ∆ creating a reasonable apprehension of imminent harmful
or offensive contact to π's person;

ii) intent by ∆ to cause π apprehension of harmful or offensive contact; and

iii) causation



Nominal damages okay. Words alone are never enough.



False Imprisonment (Tort) - Answer i) an act or omission on the part of ∆ that confines or

, Can arise by threats of force.

Common defense is consent or shopkeeper's privilege



Shopkeeper's Privilege - Answer Privilege to false imprisonment where

i) there is a reasonable belief as to the fact of theft;

ii) detention must be conducted in a reasonable manner and only non-deadly force can be used

iii) detention must be only for a reasonable period of time and only for the purpose of making
an investigation.



Conversion - Answer i) an act by ∆ interfering with π's right of possession in a chattel that is
serious enough in nature or in consequence to warrant that the ∆ will pay full value of the
chattel;

ii) intent to perform the act bringing about interference with the π's right of possession; and

iii) causation



Trespass to Land (Tort) - Answer i) an act of physical invasion on π's real property by the ∆;

ii) intent of the ∆ to bring about a physical invasion of π's real property; and

iii) causation.



Damages are presumed.



Self Defense (Tort) - Answer When a person has reasonable grounds to believe that he is
being, or is about to be, attacked, he may use or threaten to use such force as is reasonably
necessary to defend himself or a third party against the other's imminent use of unlawful force.



Reasonably prudent person standard applied.



Cannot be used in retaliation.



Defense of Consent (Tort) - Answer Consent may be express or implied. Consent is implied by
law where action is necessary to save a person's life or some other important interest in the
person or property.

Document information

Uploaded on
April 8, 2025
Number of pages
14
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
$11.99

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
COCOSOLUTIONS
4.1
(39)
Sold
234
Followers
16
Items
9793
Last sold
1 week ago




Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions