RRLLB81 Assignment
1 QUIZ (COMPLETE
ANSWERS) Semester
1 2025 - DUE 20
March 2025
[Type the document subtitle]
[Pick the date]
. Correct set of case citationsAnswer: ALegal case citations follow a specific
format that includes the case name, year, law report citation, court
abbreviation, and paragraph number when referencing a specific part of the
judgment. The correct format in South African case law generally uses square
brackets for the year when referring to cases in law reports that are organized
by year rather than volume. Additionally, proper spacing, punctuation, and
capitalization are essential
, Exam (elaborations)
RRLLB81 Assignment 1 QUIZ (COMPLETE
ANSWERS) Semester 1 2025 - DUE 20 March
2025 LLB Research Report (RRLLB81)
Institution
University Of South Africa (Unisa)
Book
Introduction to Legal Research Method and Legal Writing
RRLLB81 Assignment 1 QUIZ (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 1 2025 - DUE
20 March 2025; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and
explanations. Ensure your success with us. ...
Match the type of text (main text, footnotes, and stand-alone quotations)
with the prescribed formatting requirements. Main text Arial font, size 12;
1,5 line spacing; 12 pt spacing after each paragraph; justified. Footnotes
Arial font, size 10; single line spacing; 0 pt spacing before and after; justified.
Stand-alone quotations Which of the following set of case citations is correct?
Select one: a. Meyers v MEC, Department of Health, Eastern Cape [2020] 2
All SA 377 (SCA) [3]; Mafika v SA Broadcasting Corporation Ltd [2010] 5BLLR
542 (LC) [2]; Frantrade Nineteen (Pty) Limited v Realty Corporation of South
Africa Limited [2019] JOL 41600 (GJ) [4]; Janse vanRensburg v Steyn 2012 (3)
SA 72 (SCA) [2]; Haitas v Froneman [2021] ZASCA 1 (6 January 2021) [5]. b.
Meyers v MEC, Department of Health, Eastern Cape [2020] 2 All SA 377
(SCA) [3]; Mafika v SA Broadcasting Corporation Ltd (2010) 5BLLR 542 (LC)
[2]; Frantrade Nineteen (Pty) Limited v Realty Corporation of South Africa
Limited (2019) JOL 41600 (GJ) [4]; Janse vanRensburg v Steyn 2012 (3) SA 72
(SCA) [2]; Haitas v Froneman and others (1158 of 2019) [2021] ZASCA 1 (6
January 2021) [5]. c. Meyers v MEC, Department of Health, Eastern Cape
(2020) 2 All SA 377 (SCA) [3]; Mafika v SA Broadcasting Corporation Ltd 2010
(5)BLLR 542 (LC) [2]; Frantrade Nineteen (Pty) Limited and others v Realty
Corporation of South Africa Limited and others (2019) JOL 41600(GJ) [4];
Janse van Rensburg v Steyn 2012 (3) SA 72 (SCA) [2]; Haitas v Froneman
and others (1158 of 2019) [2021] ZASCA 1 (6 January2021 Which of the
following is the correct way of doing so? Select one: a. South African Police
Service Act 68 of 1995, s 8(1) (c). b. South African Police Service Act 68 of
1995, para 8(1) (c). c. South African Police Service Act No. 68 of 1995, s 8(1)
(c). You want to cite paragraph 13 of the case as reported in the All South
African Law Reports in a footnote. Which one of the following is thecorrect
way of doing so? Select one: a. Masinga v Chief of the South African National
Defence Force [2022] 2 All SA 399 (SCA) [13]. b. Masinga v Chief of the