• Wrong document? Swap it for free
  • Written by students who passed
  • Immediately available after payment
  • Read online or as PDF
Sell
Where do you study
Your language
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 4 out of 39 pages
Exam (elaborations)

Ocr 2024 Gcse History A (Explaining The Modern World) J410/07 International Relations: The Changing International Order 1918–1975 With The Usa 1945–1974: The People And The State Verified Question Paper And Marking Scheme Combined June 2024

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 4 out of 39 pages

OCR 2024 GCSE HISTORY A (EXPLAINING THE MODERN WORLD) J410/07 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS: THE CHANGING INTERNATIONAL ORDER 1918–1975 WITH THE USA 1945–1974: THE PEOPLE AND THE STATE VERIFIED QUESTION PAPER AND MARKING SCHEME COMBINED JUNE 2024 2 Section A International Relations: the changing international order 1918–1975 You should spend about 1 hour on this section. 1 Outline the main disagreements between the leaders of the Allied powers at the Yalta and/or Potsdam conference(s). 2 Explain why Germany was unhappy with the terms of the Treaty of Versailles. 3 Study Interpretation A. Do you think this interpretation is a fair comment on the British policy of appeasement? Use other interpretations of the events of 1937–1939 and your knowledge to support your answer. Interpretation A From ‘Europe since Napoleon’ by David Thomson, first published in 1957. [5] [10] [25] Chamberlain’s policy of appeasement was based on a completely mistaken theory that Hitler’s aims were limited to reversing the wrongs which Hitler said had been done to Germany in 1919. Chamberlain believed Hitler had legitimate grievances and that Germany had had a raw deal. He believed that if they gave in to some of Hitler’s demands, the German leader would settle down peacefully. At the same time, Chamberlain wanted a programme of rearmament, to remove any temptation for Hitler to ask for more. His basic mistake was to think that someone as fanatical as Hitler had only limited aims. J410/07 Jun24 3 4 Study Interpretation B. Explain why not all historians and commentators have agreed with this interpretation. Use other interpretations and your knowledge to support your answer. () Spelling, punctuation and grammar and the use of specialist terminology Interpretation B [20] [5] From ‘The Roots of European Security’ by Soviet historian Vadim Nekrasov, published in 1984. At the end of the Second World War, the United States believed that it had become the undisputed leader of the world. Its leaders deliberately tried to make relations with the USSR worse. The formation of NATO in April 1949 was clearly aimed at preparing for war against the USSR. The United States planned to use NATO to place air bases in Europe, from where air strikes could be made on Moscow. But the USSR did not give up on its hopes for cooperation. Its leaders made every effort to prevent the world from being split into two opposing military-political groupings.

Content preview

OCR 2024 GCSE HISTORY A (EXPLAINING THE
MODERN WORLD) J410/07 INTERNATIONAL
RELATIONS: THE CHANGING INTERNATIONAL
ORDER 1918–1975 WITH THE USA 1945–1974: THE
PEOPLE AND THE STATE

VERIFIED QUESTION PAPER AND MARKING SCHEME
COMBINED
JUNE 2024

, 2

Section A

International Relations: the changing international order 1918–1975

You should spend about 1 hour on this section.


1 Outline the main disagreements between the leaders of the Allied powers at the Yalta and/or
Potsdam conference(s). [5]


2 Explain why Germany was unhappy with the terms of the Treaty of Versailles. [10]


3 Study Interpretation A.

Do you think this interpretation is a fair comment on the British policy of appeasement?

Use other interpretations of the events of 1937–1939 and your knowledge to support your
answer. [25]


Interpretation A

From ‘Europe since Napoleon’ by David Thomson, first published in 1957.

Chamberlain’s policy of appeasement was based on a completely mistaken theory that
Hitler’s aims were limited to reversing the wrongs which Hitler said had been done to
Germany in 1919. Chamberlain believed Hitler had legitimate grievances and that Germany
had had a raw deal. He believed that if they gave in to some of Hitler’s demands, the German
leader would settle down peacefully. At the same time, Chamberlain wanted a programme of
rearmament, to remove any temptation for Hitler to ask for more. His basic mistake was to
think that someone as fanatical as Hitler had only limited aims.




J410/07 Jun24

, 3

4 Study Interpretation B.

Explain why not all historians and commentators have agreed with this interpretation.

Use other interpretations and your knowledge to support your answer. [20]

() Spelling, punctuation and grammar and the use of specialist terminology [5]



Interpretation B

From ‘The Roots of European Security’ by Soviet historian Vadim Nekrasov, published in 1984.

At the end of the Second World War, the United States believed that it had become the
undisputed leader of the world. Its leaders deliberately tried to make relations with the USSR
worse. The formation of NATO in April 1949 was clearly aimed at preparing for war against
the USSR. The United States planned to use NATO to place air bases in Europe, from
where air strikes could be made on Moscow. But the USSR did not give up on its hopes
for cooperation. Its leaders made every effort to prevent the world from being split into two
opposing military-political groupings.




Turn over for Section B




J410/07 Jun24 Turn over

, 4

Section B

The USA 1945–1974: The People and the State

You should spend about 45 minutes on this section.



5 Describe one feature of the Montgomery Bus Boycott. [2]


6 Explain the impact of African American civil rights protests during the early and mid 1960s. [10]


7 Study Sources A and B.

How far do these sources agree about attitudes of Americans towards the Vietnam War? [10]



Source A

An extract from a policy statement by the Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee (SNCC).
It was entitled ‘Statement on Vietnam’ and released in January 1966.
© snccdigital.org, SNCC Digital Gateway. Item removed due to third party copyright restrictions. Link to material - https://snccdigital.org/inside-sncc/policy-statements/vietnam/




J410/07 Jun24

Document information

Uploaded on
February 19, 2025
Number of pages
39
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
$10.49

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
AnyaTaylor
4.2
(24)
Sold
140
Followers
25
Items
2230
Last sold
1 week ago



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions