https://www.stuvia.com/user/edupac
LSAT Exam Practice Questions and Answers _ Law School Admission Test Prephttps://www.stuvia.com/user/edupac
https://www.stuvia.com/user/edupac
https://www.stuvia.com/user/edupachttps://www.stuvia.com/usehttps://www.stuvia.com/user/
edupacr/edupac
LSAT Exam Practice
Questions and Answers |
Law School Admission Test
Prep
https://www.stuvia.com/user/edupac
https://www.stuvia.com/user/edupachttps://www.stuvia.com/uhttps://www.stuvia.com/user/
edupacser/edupac
https://www.stuvia.com/user/edupacPage 1 of 90 https://www.stuvia.com/user/edupac 7/4/2026, 8:44:31 AMhttps://www.stuvia.com/user/edupac
,https://www.stuvia.com/user/edupac
1000 Flashcards Law School Admission Test (LSAT) Examhttps://www.stuvia.com/user/edupac
https://www.stuvia.com/user/edupac
A > B, B > C. What follows?
A > C.
A→B, B→C, C→D. What can be inferred?
A→D.
Absolute statements are always stronger than nuanced statements.
False. Absolute claims are often easier to disprove.
Active readers focus on why information is included, not merely what information is ________.
Presented.
Admission occurs if and only if qualifications are met. What follows?
Admission and qualifications imply each other.
"All attorneys must be licensed. Jane is an attorney." What completes the argument?
Therefore, Jane must be licensed.
"All birds can fly." What disproves the statement?
One flightless bird.
All judges are attorneys. Sarah is a judge. What inference follows?
Sarah is an attorney.
Allowing students one extra absence will supposedly destroy academic standards nationwide.
What flaw appears?
Slippery slope reasoning.
All roses are flowers; therefore all flowers are roses. What error exists?
Category confusion through reversal.
All senators are elected officials. Maria is a senator. What can be inferred?
Maria is an elected official.
https://www.stuvia.com/user/edupacPage 2 of 90 https://www.stuvia.com/user/edupac 7/4/2026, 8:44:31 AMhttps://www.stuvia.com/user/edupac
, https://www.stuvia.com/user/edupac
1000 Flashcards Law School Admission Test (LSAT) Examhttps://www.stuvia.com/user/edupac
https://www.stuvia.com/user/edupac
"All successful lawyers are excellent speakers. Sarah is a successful lawyer. Therefore, Sarah
is an excellent speaker." What reasoning structure is used?
Deductive reasoning.
Ambiguous concepts create uncertainty about intended ________.
Meaning.
Analogies depend on relevant ________.
Similarities.
Analogies fail when relevant ________ outweigh similarities.
Differences.
Anecdotal stories are used to prove a broad statistical claim. What issue exists?
Evidentiary mismatch.
Anecdotes may illustrate a point but rarely establish ________.
General conclusions.
An answer can be factually true yet wrong if it falls outside the passage's ________.
Scope.
An answer choice extends a passage's claim to all situations. What warning sign exists?
It may exceed the inferential boundary.
An answer choice uses stronger language than the passage. What warning sign exists?
Possible exaggeration trap.
An argument about education cites weather statistics. What issue may exist?
Lack of evidentiary relevance.
An argument assumes all applicants submitted complete forms. Negating this assumption
shows some did not. What happens?
The argument weakens, suggesting the assumption was necessary.
https://www.stuvia.com/user/edupacPage 3 of 90 https://www.stuvia.com/user/edupac 7/4/2026, 8:44:31 AMhttps://www.stuvia.com/user/edupac
LSAT Exam Practice Questions and Answers _ Law School Admission Test Prephttps://www.stuvia.com/user/edupac
https://www.stuvia.com/user/edupac
https://www.stuvia.com/user/edupachttps://www.stuvia.com/usehttps://www.stuvia.com/user/
edupacr/edupac
LSAT Exam Practice
Questions and Answers |
Law School Admission Test
Prep
https://www.stuvia.com/user/edupac
https://www.stuvia.com/user/edupachttps://www.stuvia.com/uhttps://www.stuvia.com/user/
edupacser/edupac
https://www.stuvia.com/user/edupacPage 1 of 90 https://www.stuvia.com/user/edupac 7/4/2026, 8:44:31 AMhttps://www.stuvia.com/user/edupac
,https://www.stuvia.com/user/edupac
1000 Flashcards Law School Admission Test (LSAT) Examhttps://www.stuvia.com/user/edupac
https://www.stuvia.com/user/edupac
A > B, B > C. What follows?
A > C.
A→B, B→C, C→D. What can be inferred?
A→D.
Absolute statements are always stronger than nuanced statements.
False. Absolute claims are often easier to disprove.
Active readers focus on why information is included, not merely what information is ________.
Presented.
Admission occurs if and only if qualifications are met. What follows?
Admission and qualifications imply each other.
"All attorneys must be licensed. Jane is an attorney." What completes the argument?
Therefore, Jane must be licensed.
"All birds can fly." What disproves the statement?
One flightless bird.
All judges are attorneys. Sarah is a judge. What inference follows?
Sarah is an attorney.
Allowing students one extra absence will supposedly destroy academic standards nationwide.
What flaw appears?
Slippery slope reasoning.
All roses are flowers; therefore all flowers are roses. What error exists?
Category confusion through reversal.
All senators are elected officials. Maria is a senator. What can be inferred?
Maria is an elected official.
https://www.stuvia.com/user/edupacPage 2 of 90 https://www.stuvia.com/user/edupac 7/4/2026, 8:44:31 AMhttps://www.stuvia.com/user/edupac
, https://www.stuvia.com/user/edupac
1000 Flashcards Law School Admission Test (LSAT) Examhttps://www.stuvia.com/user/edupac
https://www.stuvia.com/user/edupac
"All successful lawyers are excellent speakers. Sarah is a successful lawyer. Therefore, Sarah
is an excellent speaker." What reasoning structure is used?
Deductive reasoning.
Ambiguous concepts create uncertainty about intended ________.
Meaning.
Analogies depend on relevant ________.
Similarities.
Analogies fail when relevant ________ outweigh similarities.
Differences.
Anecdotal stories are used to prove a broad statistical claim. What issue exists?
Evidentiary mismatch.
Anecdotes may illustrate a point but rarely establish ________.
General conclusions.
An answer can be factually true yet wrong if it falls outside the passage's ________.
Scope.
An answer choice extends a passage's claim to all situations. What warning sign exists?
It may exceed the inferential boundary.
An answer choice uses stronger language than the passage. What warning sign exists?
Possible exaggeration trap.
An argument about education cites weather statistics. What issue may exist?
Lack of evidentiary relevance.
An argument assumes all applicants submitted complete forms. Negating this assumption
shows some did not. What happens?
The argument weakens, suggesting the assumption was necessary.
https://www.stuvia.com/user/edupacPage 3 of 90 https://www.stuvia.com/user/edupac 7/4/2026, 8:44:31 AMhttps://www.stuvia.com/user/edupac
