Answers
What is your approach to working with someone whose values are vastly different from your
own. My main goal is to always maintain a positive relationship and to have respectful
shared decision-making despite differences we may have. It is important to be an active listener
while also being compassionate and empathetic in order to try and understand where they are
coming from and actively promote problem solving so that no major conflicts arise.
Working with difficult people. I believe the difficulty is in the relationship, not simply the
person. There were a couple of patients who would frequently show up in the ED that would
frustrate many of the clinicians. Whenever I would work with these patients, I would check my
frustration and bias before going into the room. Once I'm in there with the patient, I have a clear
agenda and set boundaries with them. I always take the time to listen to their concerns and
empathize with their situation. These strategies have helped me many times and my
conversations with them have usually been positive and fruitful.
I usually get along with most of my coworkers and bosses. When I was working as a student on
the campus library, I had a difficult time while working with another student worker. His
unfriendly behavior was lowering my overall job satisfaction and performance. I pulled him
aside one day after work and told him how his behavior was making me feel. Surprisingly, he
apologizes, saying that he was overwhelmed with schoolwork, which was affecting his behavior
at work. After that, he was friendlier and I was more understanding.
, CASPER Exam Questions With Correct
Answers
What do you think is the significance of the statistic presented in the first sentence, that though
86% of people know that excess salt consumption is bad for their health, only 53% of them
actually consider salt content when making food choices? The statistic alludes to the fact
that individuals do not always act upon their knowledge. I do not want to assume that this
statistic is 100% supported by the scientific field, but people's dieting habits are influenced by a
vareity of factors including culture, societal and financial. Some people may understand that they
should not eat excess salt but they can only afford to buy processed food and foods high in
sodium.
In countries where the provision of health care services is subsidized by the government, do you
think that governments should be able to prevent access to substances known to cause chronic
disease? Why or why not? I think this depends on the substance. I think that in theory, it
would be a decision made in an attempt to help others, but it also limits one's personal choice and
high calorie food and overconsumption of sugar can cause issues like diabetes but you cannot
ban these foods altogether for the "greater good" instead they should focus their efforts on public
health education to help their citizens learn to have a balanced diet.
Processed meat has been found to be a carcinogen in humans, putting it in the same class as
smoking cigarettes. As a public health official, what steps would you take when considering a
ban on processed meats in your community? I would first look at the statistics of people in