100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

FTCE ESE k-12

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
24
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
29-10-2024
Written in
2024/2025

Exam of 24 pages for the course FTCE ESE k-12 at FTCE ESE k-12 (FTCE ESE k-12)

Institution
FTCE ESE K-12
Course
FTCE ESE k-12










Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
FTCE ESE k-12
Course
FTCE ESE k-12

Document information

Uploaded on
October 29, 2024
Number of pages
24
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Content preview

FTCE ESE k-12 GRADE A Q&A
English - (correct answer)


IDEA - (correct answer)Individuals with Disabilities Act. Requires states to provide free,
appropriate public education for all students with disabilities who participate in special
education. The four main challenge areas: learning, social/emotional, motor skills, and
communication. The basic source of law for special education. Represents the latest
phase in the philosophy of educating children with disabilities



*Brown v. Board of Education, 1954 - (correct answer)Topeka, Kansas. Addressed the
inequality of "separate but equal" facilities on the basis of race. School segregation
became illegal.



*Diana v. The State Board of Education, 1970 - (correct answer)This case resulted in
the decision that all children must be tested in their native language



Wyatt v. Stickney, 1971 - (correct answer)Established the right to adequate treatment
(education) for institutionalized persons with mental retardation


*Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Citizens (PARC) v. Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania, 1972 - (correct answer)The first right to education lawsuit. Laid the
foundation for the right to education for all children with disabilities previously denied if
they had not attained a mental age of 5 by the start of first grade. Special Education
was guaranteed to children with mental retardation. The victory in this case sparked
other court cases for children with other disabilities.



*Mills v. Board of Education of the District of Columbia, 1972 - (correct answer)The right
to special education was extended to all children with disabilities, not just mentally
retarded children. Judgements in PARC and Mills paved the way for P.L. 94-142.
Students with disabilities must be given education regardless of the schools' financial
limitations.

,Public Law 93-112 (Rehabilitation Amendments of 1973) - (correct answer)The first
comprehensive federal statute to address specifically the rights of disabled youth. It
prohibited illegal discrimination in education, employment, or housing on the basis of a
disability.



Section 504, Rehabilitation Act of 1973 - (correct answer)Section 504 expands on older
law by extending its protection to other areas that receive federal assistance, such as
education. Protected individuals must (a) have a physical or mental impairment that
substantially limits one or more major life activities, such as self-care, walking, seeing,
breathing, working, or learning; (b) have a record of such an impairment; or (c) be
regarded as having such an impairment. A disability in itself is not sufficient grounds for
a complaint of discrimination. The person must be otherwise qualified, or able to meet,
the requirements of the program in question.



Public Law 93-380 (Education Amendments of 1974) - (correct answer)P.L.94-142 is the
funding portion of this act. It required states to provide full educational opportunities for
children with disabilities. It addressed identification, fair evaluation, alternative
placements, due process procedures, and free, appropriate public education.



Public Law 94-142 Education for all Handicapped Children Act), 1975 - (correct
answer)Provided for a free, appropriate public education for all children with disabilities,
defined special education and related services, and imposed rigid guidelines on the
provisions of those services. It paralleled the provision for a free and appropriate public
education in section 504 of Public Law 94-142 and extended these services to
preschool children with disabilities (ages 3-5) through provisions to preschool incentive
grants.


Seven fundamental provisions of IDEA - (correct answer)1. Free Appropriate Public
Education (FAPE)

2. Notification and procedural rights for parents.

3. Identification and services to all children

4. Necessary related services.

5. Individualized assessments
6. Individualized Education Plans (IEP's)

, 7. Least Restrictive Environment (LRE)



Goss v. Lopez, 1975 - (correct answer)This case ruled that the state could not deny a
student education without following due process. While this decision is not based on a
special education issue, the process of school suspension and expulsion is obviously
critical in assuring an appropriate public education to children with disabilities.



Public Law 95-56 (Gifted and Talented Children's Act), 1978 - (correct answer)This case
defined the gifted and talented population, and focused upon this exceptionally
category, which was not included in Public Law 94-142



*Larry P. V. Riles, 1979 - (correct answer)This case ordered the reevaluation of black
students enrolled in classes for educable mental retardation (EMR) and enjoined the
California State Department of Education from the use of intelligible tests in subsequent
EMR placement decisions.



Parents in Action on Special Education (PASE) v. Hannon, 1980 - (correct answer)Ruled
that IQ tests are necessarily biased against ethnic and racial subcultures.



Board of Education v. Rowley, 1982 - (correct answer)Amy Rowley was a deaf
elementary school student whose parents rejected their school district's proposal to
provide a tutor and speech therapist services to supplement their daughter's instruction
in the regular classroom. Her parents insisted on an interpreter even though Amy was
making satisfactory social, academic, and educational progress without one. In deciding
in favor of the school district, the Supreme Court ruled that school districts must provide
those services that permit a student with disabilities to benefit from instruction.
Essentially, the court ruled that the states are obligated to provide a "basic floor of
opportunity" that is reasonable to allow the child to benefit from social education.



Public Law 98-199 (Education of the Handicapped Act [EHA] Amendments), 1983 -
(correct answer)P.L. 94-142 was amended to provide added emphasis on parental
education and preschool, secondary, and post-secondary programs for children and
youth with disabilities.
$9.99
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
douglasmugwe82
5.0
(1)

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
douglasmugwe82 Teachme2-tutor
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
2
Member since
1 year
Number of followers
0
Documents
4239
Last sold
2 months ago
fully answered questions and answer

fully answered questions and answer

5.0

1 reviews

5
1
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions