[Type the company name]
LJU4801 OCTOBER
NOVEMBER PORTFOLIO
(COMPLETE ANSWERS)
Semester 2 2024 - DUE 30
October 2024
[Type the document subtitle]
[Year]
, Course
Legal Philosophy (LJU4801)
Institution
University Of South Africa (Unisa)
Book
An Introduction to African Legal Philosophy
LJU4801 OCTOBER NOVEMBER PORTFOLIO (COMPLETE ANSWERS)
Semester 2 2024 - DUE 30 October 2024; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted
solutions and explanations. Ensure your success with us...
Question 1 Read the following scenario and then answer the question below:
The football governing body is investigating Mark Pachio’s deliberate handball
during the quarter final match between Shibobo FC and Maluti FC. Shibobo
FC defender, Pachio, used his hand to stop Mpho Motale’s header on the line
which would have sent Maluti FC through to the semi-final. While Pachio was
given a straight red card for his actions, his 'Hand of God' intervention
ultimately paid-off as Maluti FC missed the resulting penalty and Shibobo FC
went through to the semi-final after winning the shoot-out. Shibobo FC does
not consider that handball as unfair or dishonest play but rather as an act for
the higher purpose of winning the game. Maluti FC, however, sees the
handball as unfair play which is inconsistent with the fair play code. 1. Discuss
the different philosophical approaches being used here (NB apply the
approaches to the set of facts). In your substantiated opinion, which approach
is the correct one? Your answer should not exceed 1250 words. (25) [25]
Question 2 Read the following scenario and then answer the question below:
In the case of R v Sachs 1953 (1) SA 392 (A) the Appeal Court said the
following: [339 H – 400 D]
1. Consequentialism: This ethical approach, especially the
utilitarian branch, is evident in Shibobo FC's stance. They
argue that Pachio's handball, although technically illegal,
served a greater purpose—helping the team win the game.
From a consequentialist perspective, actions are judged by
their outcomes, so if stopping the goal led to success for
LJU4801 OCTOBER
NOVEMBER PORTFOLIO
(COMPLETE ANSWERS)
Semester 2 2024 - DUE 30
October 2024
[Type the document subtitle]
[Year]
, Course
Legal Philosophy (LJU4801)
Institution
University Of South Africa (Unisa)
Book
An Introduction to African Legal Philosophy
LJU4801 OCTOBER NOVEMBER PORTFOLIO (COMPLETE ANSWERS)
Semester 2 2024 - DUE 30 October 2024; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted
solutions and explanations. Ensure your success with us...
Question 1 Read the following scenario and then answer the question below:
The football governing body is investigating Mark Pachio’s deliberate handball
during the quarter final match between Shibobo FC and Maluti FC. Shibobo
FC defender, Pachio, used his hand to stop Mpho Motale’s header on the line
which would have sent Maluti FC through to the semi-final. While Pachio was
given a straight red card for his actions, his 'Hand of God' intervention
ultimately paid-off as Maluti FC missed the resulting penalty and Shibobo FC
went through to the semi-final after winning the shoot-out. Shibobo FC does
not consider that handball as unfair or dishonest play but rather as an act for
the higher purpose of winning the game. Maluti FC, however, sees the
handball as unfair play which is inconsistent with the fair play code. 1. Discuss
the different philosophical approaches being used here (NB apply the
approaches to the set of facts). In your substantiated opinion, which approach
is the correct one? Your answer should not exceed 1250 words. (25) [25]
Question 2 Read the following scenario and then answer the question below:
In the case of R v Sachs 1953 (1) SA 392 (A) the Appeal Court said the
following: [339 H – 400 D]
1. Consequentialism: This ethical approach, especially the
utilitarian branch, is evident in Shibobo FC's stance. They
argue that Pachio's handball, although technically illegal,
served a greater purpose—helping the team win the game.
From a consequentialist perspective, actions are judged by
their outcomes, so if stopping the goal led to success for
