Border Patrol Practice Exam Questions & Answers

Valid Conclusion or Invalid Conclusion Some of the people who speak Spanish are at my party. - ANSWERSValid Valid Conclusion or Invalid Conclusion Some lawyers are Supreme Court Justices. - ANSWERSValid Valid Conclusion or Invalid Conclusion Everyone working for the US Government is a CBP Officer - ANSWERSInvalid Valid Conclusion or Invalid Conclusion All the people who speak Spanish are at my party - ANSWERSInvalid Valid Conclusion or Invalid Conclusion All lawyers are Supreme Court Justices - ANSWERSInvalid Valid Conclusion or Invalid Conclusion Some employees of the US Government are CBP Officers - ANSWERSValid Valid Conclusion or Invalid Conclusion If a person is not an employee of the US Government, the person is not a CBP Officer - ANSWERSValid Valid Conclusion or Invalid Conclusion If a criminal is released, the criminal has recieved a pardon - ANSWERSInvalid Valid Conclusion or Invalid Conclusion If a person is not guilty of a felony, that person has not been convicted of a murder - ANSWERSValid Valid Conclusion or Invalid Conclusion If a person lives in Europe, the person lives in Germany - ANSWERSInvalid Valid Conclusion or Invalid Conclusion If a car runs, the car has gas - ANSWERSValid Valid Conclusion or Invalid Conclusion If a person is an employee of the US Government, the person is a CBP Officer - ANSWERSInvalid Valid Conclusion or Invalid Conclusion If a criminal is not released, the criminal has not received a pardon - ANSWERSValid Valid Conclusion or Invalid Conclusion If a person is guilty of a felony, that person has been convicted of murder - ANSWERSInvalid Valid Conclusion or Invalid Conclusion If a person does not live in Europe, the person does not live in Germany - ANSWERSValid Valid Conclusion or Invalid Conclusion If a car does not run, the car has no gas - ANSWERSInvalid Positive Words or Negative Words All - ANSWERSPositive Positive Words or Negative Words Seldom - ANSWERSNegative Positive Words or Negative Words Some - ANSWERSPositive Positive Words or Negative Words Never - ANSWERSNegative Positive Words or Negative Words Most - ANSWERSPositive Positive Words or Negative Words Always - ANSWERSPositive Positive Words or Negative Words Illegal - ANSWERSNegative Positive Words or Negative Words Prohibited - ANSWERSNegative Positive Prefixes or Negative Prefixes Non- - ANSWERSNegative Positive Prefixes or Negative Prefixes Un- - ANSWERSNegative Positive Prefixes or Negative Prefixes Dis- - ANSWERSNegative What are examples of Connector Words? - ANSWERSWhenever Unless Except Often, crimes are characterized as either malum in se-inherently evil-or malum prohibitum-criminal because they are declared as offenses by a legislature. Murder is an example of the former. Failing to file a tax return illustrates the later. Some jurisdictions no longer distinguish between crimes malum in se and malum prohibitum, although many still do. What is a Validly Conclusion? A) Many jurisdictions no longer distinguish between crimes malum in se and malum prohibitum B) Some jurisdictions still distinguish between crimes malum in se and malum prohibitum C) Some crimes characterized as malum in se are not inherently evil D) Some crimes characterized as malum prohibitum are not declared by a legislature to be an offense E) Sometimes failing to file a tax return is characterized as malum in se - ANSWERSB A trucking company can act as a common carrier-for hire to the general public at published rates. As a common carrier, it is liable for any cargo damage, unless the company can show that it was not negligent. If the company can demonstrate that it was not negligent, then it is not liable for cargo damage. In contrast, a contract carrier (a trucking company hired by a shipper under a specific contract) is only responsible for cargo damage as spelled out in the contract. A Claus Inc. tractor-trailer, acting under contract carrier authority, was involved in the same accident, and its cargo was also damaged. What is a Validly Conclusion? A) If Claus Inc. is liable, then it can show that it was not negligent B) If Claus Inc. cannot show that it was not negligent, then it is not liable C) If Claus Inc. can show that it was not negligent, then it is not liable D) If Nichols Inc. is liable, then it cannot show that it - ANSWERSC A rapidly changing technical environment in government is promoting greater reliance on electronic mail (email) systems. As this usage grows, there are increasing chances of conflict between the users' expectations of privacy and public access rights. In some investigations, access to all e-mail, including those messages stored in archival files and messages outside the scope of the investigation, has been sought and granted. In spite of this, some people send messages through e-mail that would never be said face-to-face or written formally.