• Wrong document? Swap it for free
  • Written by students who passed
  • Immediately available after payment
  • Read online or as PDF
Sell
Where do you study
Your language
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 3 out of 27 pages
Exam (elaborations)

TCPS 2_ CORE Review (Multiple choice)Correctly Answered.

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 3 out of 27 pages

TCPS 2_ CORE Review (Multiple choice)Correctly Answered.

Content preview

10/11/24, 11:46 AM




TCPS 2: CORE Review
Jeremiah

Terms in this set (206)


research oversight group that evaluates research to protect the rights of
Research Ethics Board (REB)
participants in the study

-to NOT deliberately harm the people who agree to participate in a research project
Researcher's intention is to...
-The intent to do no harm, however, is not a guarantee that no harm will occur.




TCPS 2: CORE Review




1/27

,10/11/24, 11:46 AM
-Philip Zimbardo's study of the effect of roles on behavior.
-Participants were randomly assigned to play either prisoners or guards in a mock
prison.
-guards became sadistic and prisoners became depressed and showed signs of
extreme stress.
-The study was ended early because of the "guards'" role-induced cruelty.
1) A Quiet Sunday Morning...
--police car swept through the town picking up college students as part of a mass
arrest for violation of Penal Codes 211, Armed Robbery, and Burglary, a 459 PC. (fake
arrests/charges)
2) Volunteers
--What suspects had done was to answer a local newspaper ad calling for
volunteers in a study of the psychological effects of prison life.
--simulated prison and then carefully note the effects of this institution on the
behavior of all those within its walls.
--More than 70 applicants but were left with a sample of 24 college students from
the U.S. and Canada who happened to be in the Stanford area and wanted to earn
$15/day by participating in a study.
--divided into two groups by a flip of the coin. Half were randomly assigned to be
guards, the other to be prisoners.
3) A State of Mild Shock...
--Blindfolded and in a state of mild shock over their surprise arrest by the city police,
our prisoners were put into a car and driven to the "Stanford County Jail" for further
processing. The prisoners were then brought into our jail one at a time and greeted
by the warden, who conveyed the seriousness of their offense and their new status
as prisoners.
4) Humiliation
--Each prisoner was systematically searched and stripped naked. He was then
deloused with a spray, to convey our belief that he may have germs or lice
5) Enforcing Law
--The guards were given no specific training on how to be guards. Instead they were
free, within limits, to do whatever they thought was necessary to maintain law and
order in the prison and to command the respect of the prisoners.
--Warden David Jaffe
--began with nine guards and nine prisoners in our jail. Three guards worked each of
three eight-hour shifts, while three prisoners occupied each of the three barren cells
around the clock. The remaining guards and prisoners from our sample of 24 were
on call in case they were needed. The cells were so small that there was room for
only three cots on which the prisoners slept or sat, with room for little else.
6) Asserting Authority
--At 2:30 A.M. the prisoners were rudely awakened from sleep by blasting whistles
for the first of many "counts." The counts served the purpose of familiarizing the
prisoners with their numbers (counts took place several times each shift and often at
night). But more importantly, these events provided a regular occasion for the
guards to exercise control over the prisoners.
7) Asserting Independence
--Because the first day passed without incident, we were surprised and totally
unprepared for the rebellion which broke out on the morning of the second day.
--At first they insisted that reinforcements be called in.
--but, got a fire extinguisher which shot a stream of skin-chilling carbon dioxide, and
they forced the prisoners away from the doors.
--The guards broke into each cell, stripped the prisoners naked, took the beds out,
forced the ringleaders of the prisoner rebellion into solitary confinement, and
generally began to harass and intimidate the prisoners.
8) Special Privileges
TCPS 2: CORE Review --couldn't have nine guards on duty at all times

2/27

, 10/11/24, 11:46 AM
--use psychological tactics instead of physical ones = setting up a privilege cell.
9) The First Prisoner Released
--Less than 36 hours into the experiment, Prisoner #8612 began suffering from acute
emotional disturbance, disorganized thinking, uncontrollable crying, and rage.
--took quite a while before we became convinced that he was really suffering and
that we had to release him.
The Stanford Prison Experiment
10) A Mass Escape Plot
--The rumor went as follows: Prisoner #8612, whom we had released the night
before, was going to round up a bunch of his friends and break in to free the
prisoners.
--decided to put an informant (an experimental confederate) in the cell that #8612
had occupied.
11) A Visit
--Gordon Bower. Gordon had heard we were doing an experiment, and he came to
see what was going on. I briefly described what we were up to, and Gordon asked
me a very simple question: "Say, what's the independent variable in this study?"
12) Paying Them Back
--The rumor of the prison break turned out to be just a rumor.
13) A Kafkaesque Element
--At this point in the study, I invited a Catholic priest who had been a prison chaplain
to evaluate how realistic our prison situation was, and the result was truly
Kafkaesque. The chaplain interviewed each prisoner individually, and I watched in
amazement as half the prisoners introduced themselves by number rather than
name.
14) #819
--The only prisoner who did not want to speak to the priest was Prisoner #819, who
was feeling sick, had refused to eat, and wanted to see a doctor rather than a priest.
Eventually he was persuaded to come out of his cell and talk to the priest and
superintendent so we could see what kind of a doctor he needed.
15) Parole Board
--The next day, all prisoners who thought they had grounds for being paroled were
chained together and individually brought before the Parole Board. The Board was
composed mainly of people who were strangers to the prisoners (departmental
secretaries and graduate students) and was headed by our top prison consultant.
16) Types of Guards
--tough but fair guards who followed prison rules
--there were "good guys" who did little favors for the prisoners and never punished
them.
--about a third of the guards were hostile, arbitrary, and inventive in their forms of
prisoner humiliation
17) John Wayne
--The prisoners even nicknamed the most macho and brutal guard in our study "John
Wayne."
18) Prisoners' Coping Styles
--Prisoners coped with their feelings of frustration and powerlessness in a variety of
ways. At first, some prisoners rebelled or fought with the guards. Four prisoners
reacted by breaking down emotionally as a way to escape the situation. One
prisoner developed a psychosomatic rash over his entire body when he learned that
his parole request had been turned down. Others tried to cope by being good
prisoners, doing everything the guards wanted them to do. One of them was even
nicknamed "Sarge," because he was so military-like in executing all commands.
19) One Final Act of Rebellion
--We did see one final act of rebellion. Prisoner #416 was newly admitted as one of
our stand-by prisoners. Unlike the other prisoners, who had experienced a gradual
escalation of harassment, this prisoner's horror was full-blown when he arrived. The
TCPS 2: CORE Review "old timer" prisoners told him that quitting was impossible, that it was a real prison.

3/27

Document information

Uploaded on
October 11, 2024
Number of pages
27
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
$12.99

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
Denyss
5.0
(2)
Sold
25
Followers
3
Items
6242
Last sold
5 months ago



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions