Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 5 pages
Other

MRL2601 - Assignment 2 - Sep 2020

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 5 pages

This is the final submitted version of a completed MRL2601 Assignment written in Sep 2020 by a 2024 cum laude student.

Content preview

Kayleigh May
Student no: 68021321
MRL2601 – Assignment 2 – Unique No: 758364
Date: 30/09/2020

, Question 1

Section 44 of the Companies Act 71 of 2008 sets out certain requirements that must be
met in order to determine if a transaction qualifies as financial assistance or not. This
section provides that a company may provide financial assistance in the form of a loan,
guarantee or provision of security to a person in order for them to acquire shares and
other securities in the company, but only if this assistance is permitted by the company’s
Memorandum of Incorporation. The board of directors have the responsibility to decide
whether they will assist a person to acquire shares in the company, but only if the
assistance is in terms of an employee share scheme that meets the requirements of
Section 97, or where a special resolution has been undertaken by the shareholders in the
previous two years that authorizes assistance to a person or persons that fall in a specific
category, and the person receiving the financial assistance must fall in that category. The
board must also have the surety that the solvency and liquidity requirements will be met
after providing the financial assistance, which must be given on fair and reasonable terms
for the company. The Memorandum of Incorporation must also be consulted to establish
whether there are further restrictions on the provision of financial assistance and if these
requirements are met.

In Lipschitz v UDC Bank Ltd, the court determined that the transaction must be assessed
in two phases, the first being that it must be established whether there was financial
assistance. In Gradwell (Pty) Ltd v Rostra Printers Ltd, the “impoverishment test” was
brought to life, which is used to consider whether the company will be poorer after the
transaction has concluded – if this is the case, then financial assistance was provided.
Secondly, it must be established whether the financial assistance was specifically for the
purchase of shares in the company. When the transaction has passed these two phases,
it also has to comply with Section 44 of the Companies Act in order to be declared as a
valid transaction.

In the scenario given, it can be concluded that the transaction of Securities (Pty) Ltd
loaning money to Jonathan to acquire shares in the company, is financial assistance.

Document information

Uploaded on
October 1, 2024
Number of pages
5
Written in
2020/2021
Type
Other
Person
Unknown
$9.68

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Sold
0
Followers
0
Items
20
Last sold
-



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions