• Wrong document? Swap it for free
  • Written by students who passed
  • Immediately available after payment
  • Read online or as PDF
Sell
Where do you study
Your language
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 3 out of 18 pages
Exam (elaborations)

Cpa Reg Questions With Answers

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 3 out of 18 pages

A - Alex and Myra Burg, married and filing joint income tax returns, derive their entire income from the operation of their retail candy shop. Their 2019 adjusted gross income was $50,000. The Burgs itemized their deductions on Schedule A for 2019. The following unreimbursed cash expenditures were among those made by the Burgs during 2019: Repair of glass vase accidentally broken in home by dog; vase cost $500 in 2014; fair value $600 before accident and $200 after accident $90 Without regard to the $100 "floor" and the adjusted gross income percentage threshold, what amount should the Burgs deduct for the casualty loss in their itemized deductions on Schedule A for 2019? A. $0 B. $ 90 C. $300 D. $400 A - Article 9 of the UCC which governs security interests has added some items that now are covered by security interests law. Which of the following is true? A. Security interests in tort claims already assessed by a court of law are covered. B. After-acquired commercial tort claims are covered. C. Both the mentioned security interests and after-acquired commercial tort claims are covered. D. Neither the mentioned security interests and after-acquired commercial tort claims are covered. A - Frank Lyon was held up and robbed of $800 cash in June 2019. One month later, Frank had $2,000 cash stolen from him by his housekeeper. Frank's adjusted gross income for 2019 was $10,000. How much was deductible by Frank for theft losses in 2019? A. $0 B. $1,600 C. $1,700 D. $1,800

Content preview

CPA Reg Test
A - ✔✔Alex and Myra Burg, married and filing joint income tax returns, derive their entire income from
the operation of their retail candy shop. Their 2019 adjusted gross income was $50,000. The Burgs
itemized their deductions on Schedule A for 2019. The following unreimbursed cash expenditures were
among those made by the Burgs during 2019:



Repair of glass vase accidentally broken in home by dog; vase cost $500 in 2014; fair value $600 before
accident and $200 after accident $90

Without regard to the $100 "floor" and the adjusted gross income percentage threshold, what amount
should the Burgs deduct for the casualty loss in their itemized deductions on Schedule A for 2019?



A. $0

B. $ 90

C. $300

D. $400



A - ✔✔Article 9 of the UCC which governs security interests has added some items that now are covered
by security interests law. Which of the following is true?



A. Security interests in tort claims already assessed by a court of law are covered.

B. After-acquired commercial tort claims are covered.

C. Both the mentioned security interests and after-acquired commercial tort claims are covered.

D. Neither the mentioned security interests and after-acquired commercial tort claims are covered.



A - ✔✔Frank Lyon was held up and robbed of $800 cash in June 2019. One month later, Frank had
$2,000 cash stolen from him by his housekeeper. Frank's adjusted gross income for 2019 was $10,000.
How much was deductible by Frank for theft losses in 2019?

A. $0

B. $1,600

C. $1,700

D. $1,800

,A - ✔✔James, a calendar-year taxpayer, was employed and resided in Boston. On February 4, 2019,
James was permanently transferred to Florida by his employer. James worked full-time for the entire
year. In 2019, James incurred and paid the following unreimbursed expenses in relocating:



Lodging and travel expenses while moving $1,000

Meals while in route to Florida 300

Cost of insuring household goods and personal effects during move 200

Cost of shipping household pets to new home 100

Costs of moving household furnishings and personal effects 3,000

What amount was deductible as moving expenses on James's 2019 tax return?



A. $0

B. $4,500

C. $4,300

D. $4,000



A - ✔✔Montrose sent Bilbo a written offer to sell his tract of land located in Majorsville for $50,000. The
parties were engaged in a separate dispute. The offer stated that it would be irrevocable for 30 days if
Bilbo would promise to refrain from suing Montrose during this time. Bilbo promptly delivered a
promise not to sue during the term of the offer and to forego suit if she accepted the offer. Montrose
subsequently decided that the possible suit by Bilbo was groundless and therefore phoned Bilbo and
revoked the offer 10 days after making it. Bilbo mailed an acceptance on the 30th day. Montrose did not
reply. Under the circumstances



A. Montrose's offer was supported by consideration, and was irrevocable for the 30 day period.

B. Bilbo's promise was accepted by Montrose by his silence.

C. Montrose's revocation, not being in writing, was invalid.

D. Montrose's written offer would be irrevocable even without consideration.



A - ✔✔Part agreed to act as Young's agent to sell Young's land. Part was instructed to disclose that Part
was acting as an agent but not to disclose Young's identity. Part contracted with Rice for Rice to

, purchase the land. After Rice discovered Young's identity, Young refused to fulfill the contract. Whom
does Rice have a cause of action against?



---------Part------------------Young

A.-----------Yes---------------Yes

B. -----------Yes----------------No

C.-----------No----------------Yes

D.-----------No----------------No



A - ✔✔Under the Sales Article of the UCC, the remedies available to a seller when a buyer breaches a
contract for the sale of goods may include



The right to resell

goods identified

to the contract

-------------------------------------The right to stop

-------------------------------------a carrier from

---------------------------------delivering the goods

A) Yes---------------------------------Yes

B) Yes----------------------------------No

C) No---------------------------------Yes

D) No---------------------------------No



A - ✔✔Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which of the following penalties could be assessed
against a CPA who intentionally violated the provisions of Section 10(b), Rule 10b-5 of the Act?




Civil liability of monetary damages

-------------------------Criminal liability of a fine

Document information

Uploaded on
August 10, 2024
Number of pages
18
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
$9.99

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Sold
4
Followers
0
Items
1105
Last sold
8 months ago




Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions