Legal 4200 Cases for Test One Questions and answers, rated A+| LATEST EXAM UPDATES| 2024/25 |

Legal 4200 Cases for Test One Questions and answers, rated A+ -LC wanted PW to make their toys and orally agreed to confidential meeting - LC left with prototype but no deal was reached -LC sells toy with prototype and PW sues for misappropriation Appellate court overturned trial court that originally said it was not a trade secret because it was not an unknown concept, concept could be easily duplicated, failed to guard secrecy, had no economic value, and expended no time, effort or money BUT -do not need 100% secrecy -can be TS if has value to secrecy -no minimum of invested time or effort required to create a trade secret THIS IS TRADE SECRET - -Learning Curve v PlayWood Toys -Courtney was recruiter for Sasqua and never signed NDA or non-compete -Courtney quit and Sasqua sought injunction to prevent Courtney from using customer list in database All the facts came from public sources so list could be easily reproduced so: -no value -not a trade secret - -Sasqua Group v Courtney -Nosal worked for KFI and decided to download confidential info from database to start competitor firm -Candidate source lists were derived from program of publicly available resumes but KFI spent thousands to get this list The way the facts were sorted and put together by proprietary into massive confidential compilation had value so -fell within scope of info that could be trade secret -expensive to reproduce - -US v Nosal *criminal case -Church of Scientology sued ex member Ehrlich who posted Church's works on Internet - Ehrlich claimed the info had no value to hi