JUR5901MEMO assignment %guaranteed

Question Advise Mrs Zitha’s legal team on their chances of success in arguing for intended matrimonial domicile , therefore, for South African law, to be applicable to the parties’ proprietary consequences of marriage. Your answer has to include a fully referenced case discussion of No 30498/06 (unreported) [2007] JOL 19342 (T). available under EReserves) Sadiku v Sadiku Case (This is one of your prescribed cases, [5] In this scenario, Mrs. Zitha's legal team wants to argue for intended matrimonial domicile as the connecting factor to determine the law applicable to the proprietary consequences of the marriage between Mr. and Mrs. Zitha. The key issue is whether South African law should apply to the proprietary consequences of their marriage.....