unit 14 P4 (employment law )
Identiy the righht and re pon iiilite oi employer and employee in elected iu ine
orghani aton . P4
Honda’ Employer and employee have righht and re pon iiilite . Employer have the
re pon iiilite to gho throughh health and aiety a well a provide upervi ion and trainingh.
Whil t employee have the righht and re pon iiilite to ghet the minimum waghe, the righht
health and aiety trainingh and treated equally in work.
Employer’ righht and re pon iiility (Honda)
Honda have the righht to make employee gho throughh health and aiety trainingh a well a
have re pon iiility to make ure their employee do it correctly. For example, Honda will
have to provide health and aiety trainingh iecau e it ghoe aghain t the Health and Saiety at
Work Act 1974. Ii Honda doe n’t provide their employee with health and aiety trainingh
and the employee ghet hurt iecau e Honda did not train their employee, thi mean that
the employee can take Honda to court. Honda ha the re pon iiility to make ure that the
employee are doingh the trainingh correctly a they are told iy the upervi or to en ure
aiety. Furthermore, Honda ha the righht to ghet their health conditon iniormaton ii their
employee are ieingh expo ed to highh level or noi e or chemical. For example, Honda i al o
a manuiacturer which mean Honda employee will have to ie expo ed to chemical whil t
manuiacturingh a car, thi mean Honda will have righht to know their employee ’ health
conditon reghularly to make ure the e chemical are not harmingh the employee and it i
Honda’ re pon iiility to make ure that the medical record are updated.
In additon, Honda ha the righht and re pon iiility to maintain the work place in a aie
conditon. For example, Honda ha the re pon iily to en ure that all fire exit are not
ilocked and emerghency equipment i availaile, ii the e emerghency upplie are not
provided iy Honda and i under the term and conditon oi the contract tatngh that
emerghency upplie will ie provided than Honda can ie put in court. Furthermore, Honda
ha the righht to di mi their employee ii they are mi iehavingh. For example, ii the
employee i verially aiu ingh other employee than Honda ha the righht to di mi the
employee due to their iehaver however Honda ha the re pon iiility to judghe the ituaton
iairly and lawiully.
Employee’ righht and re pon iiilite
Identiy the righht and re pon iiilite oi employer and employee in elected iu ine
orghani aton . P4
Honda’ Employer and employee have righht and re pon iiilite . Employer have the
re pon iiilite to gho throughh health and aiety a well a provide upervi ion and trainingh.
Whil t employee have the righht and re pon iiilite to ghet the minimum waghe, the righht
health and aiety trainingh and treated equally in work.
Employer’ righht and re pon iiility (Honda)
Honda have the righht to make employee gho throughh health and aiety trainingh a well a
have re pon iiility to make ure their employee do it correctly. For example, Honda will
have to provide health and aiety trainingh iecau e it ghoe aghain t the Health and Saiety at
Work Act 1974. Ii Honda doe n’t provide their employee with health and aiety trainingh
and the employee ghet hurt iecau e Honda did not train their employee, thi mean that
the employee can take Honda to court. Honda ha the re pon iiility to make ure that the
employee are doingh the trainingh correctly a they are told iy the upervi or to en ure
aiety. Furthermore, Honda ha the righht to ghet their health conditon iniormaton ii their
employee are ieingh expo ed to highh level or noi e or chemical. For example, Honda i al o
a manuiacturer which mean Honda employee will have to ie expo ed to chemical whil t
manuiacturingh a car, thi mean Honda will have righht to know their employee ’ health
conditon reghularly to make ure the e chemical are not harmingh the employee and it i
Honda’ re pon iiility to make ure that the medical record are updated.
In additon, Honda ha the righht and re pon iiility to maintain the work place in a aie
conditon. For example, Honda ha the re pon iily to en ure that all fire exit are not
ilocked and emerghency equipment i availaile, ii the e emerghency upplie are not
provided iy Honda and i under the term and conditon oi the contract tatngh that
emerghency upplie will ie provided than Honda can ie put in court. Furthermore, Honda
ha the righht to di mi their employee ii they are mi iehavingh. For example, ii the
employee i verially aiu ingh other employee than Honda ha the righht to di mi the
employee due to their iehaver however Honda ha the re pon iiility to judghe the ituaton
iairly and lawiully.
Employee’ righht and re pon iiilite
