CITI Training and Belmont Report Questions and Answers with Verified Solutions

CITI Training and Belmont Report Questions and Answers with Verified Solutions Three principles of Belmont Report Respect for Persons Beneficence Justice The Belmont Report Principle of Beneficence MAXIMIZATION of benefits and MINIMIZATION of risks T/F Belmont Report indicates it is necessary to rigorously avoid conflicts of interest TRUE The Belmont Report Respect for Person Requires that subjects freely choose to participate in research (voluntariness) and that they are adequately informed about a study (informed consent) The Belmont Report defines and delineates... "Practice" and "Research" The Belmont Report The Principle of Justice Research benefit and burden distribution and that selection of subjects is fair. T/F The Belmont report describes the necessity to effectively manage conflicts of interest FALSE Students in Research The history of ethical regulations in human subjects research began with the Nuremberg Code Nuremberg Code Human subjects research guidelines and regulations Year of the Nuremberg Code 1949 Additional resources regarding IRB approval process Faculty advisor/Research Mentor IRB office Human subjects research websites What element must be included in an informed consent? All foreseeable risks and discomforts Which type of IRB review does not require and IRB approval but DOES require a Determination by the IRB? If the study qualifies for EXEMPTION Another name for the "Exempt" status the Common Rule stated in Title 45 Part 46 Subpart A How can faculty researchers avoid coercion of student subjects? Avoid using their own students in their research Name the type of Review: Research study that involves use of educational tests, survey, interviews, or observations of public behavior without identifiable information. Exempt Review category 2 Name the type of review: A study involving data collected that could have an impact on human subject's careers and it contains identifiers of the subjects. Full Board Review Type of review that qualifies if no identification of subjects and/or their responses would reasonably place them at risk of criminal or civil liability or be damaging to the subjects financial standing, employability, insurability, reputation, or be stigmatizing, unless reasonable and