The Missouri Compromise 1820
Built on the precedent set by the Northwest Ordinance in 1787
Clay’s compromise admitted Maine (free) alongside Missouri (slave), maintaining the Congressional
balance
o It set the precedent that states could only join in pairs
Slavery was prohibited above the 3630 parallel
Why was it a cause of the civil war?
Increased tensions as the area above was greater than below, upsetting the Congressional
and sectional balance and allow the North to suppress slavery through the government
Made the South more defensive and protective over slavery, and increased their distrust of a
Northernbiased federal government
o Increased paranoia and slave power conspiracy
Overall, it set the tone for political and sectional divide
Quotes:
“A clever compromise but a clumsy one. It simply put off the evil day” – Grant
“A fire bell in the night” and “the knell of the Union” – Jefferson
Evaluation – why wasn’t it a cause of war?
It delayed conflict and maintained relative peace in the short term
“It helped keep the peace for the next decade” – Brogan
Andrew Jackson:
Did Jackson democratise politics?
Enhanced participation and the twoparty system
Voting and participation
o ‘Jacksonian Democracy’
o Property requirement began to be removed
o Written ballots replaced caucusing and voting aloud
o Nomination conventions meant voters directly voted for presidential electors, compared to
previously being done by state legislatures – 1824, only 6 state legislatures elected, and by
1832 only 1
o Newspapers and communication – by 1835 there were 1200 newspapers, compared to 31
in 1775, encouraging media involvement and partisanship
Twoparty system
o His divisive nature and representing of the common man led to the creation of the
Democratic Party for the 1828 election – democratising politics by providing platforms that
gave greater voter choice, and improving accountability
o This sectionalisation of politics increased partisanship and involvement
Evaluation
o Much of this was happening before him – he inherited much of the change
Universal male suffrage was all but achieved by 1820
His politics coincided with the transportation revolution, which made his impact
seem greater
Nomination conventions were occurring before him too – only 6 states elected
presidential electors in 1824
He did nothing for women or free blacks’ suffrage
o The modern campaigning style and the twoparty system was mainly down to Martin van
Buren, not Jackson
, Van Buren had utilised similar methods in the Albany Regency in New York in the
early 20s
Jackson merely brought these methods onto a national stage
Conclusion
o Jackson did democratise participation and voting through the twoparty system
o Although he wasn’t the source of many of the ideas, he brought it to a national stage and
thus democratised national politics
“Jackson’s election did not mean that America had become a democracy overnight…
it merely proved that the process was complete” – Brogan
War on corruption and privilege
Spoils system
o Limited the time officeholders could remain in office through the ‘Tenure of Office Act’
o Ensured rotation in office and prevented the concentration of power in one individual
1828 election
o Following the ‘corrupt bargain’ of the 1824 election – where Adams was elected despite
Jackson winning the majority (41%) of the popular vote – Jackson campaigned on a
platform against elitism and corruption
o It was very much representation of the commonman against the elite
o Jackson’s supporters described it as a choice between “the democracy of the country an a
lordly purseproud aristocracy” – Boyer
War on the Bank
o The antiestablishment sentiment that he campaigned on was most evident in the War on
the Bank
o Most of the public blamed the banks for the Panic of 1819 (monetary irresponsibility), and
Jackson too feared the power they had accumulated – their $35m capital was more
than double the annual government expenditure
o Through vetoing Congress’ bill the recharter the bank, he was democratising politics by
preventing the build of power in one unelected, decentralised body
o It was also advocating states’ rights through removing deposits and placing them in state
‘pet’ banks
o As a result of the veto, the Whig party was formed, further democratising politics
Evaluation
o The Spoils System wasn’t as democratic as first considered
Most of the firings were concentrated in the Northwest, where most of Jackson’s
opposition was situated
In his first 18 months, fewer that 1000 of the 10,000 civil servants and fewer
than 20% of federal officeholders were replaced
Many of the replacements were likeforlike elitists, just now were Jackson
supporters
o The War on the Bank, although democratising, was parochial as monetary authority was
decentralised and uncoordinated – ultimately led to the Panic of 1837
Conclusion
o Jackson waged a war on elitism fairly successfully and set a precedent, however, there were
some convenient loopholes
Big government intervention
Nullification Crisis
o Events:
South Carolina declared the 1828 ‘Tariff of Abominations’ as unconstitutional,
and therefore null and void, and threatened secession
Jackson publicly clashed with Calhoun
Jackson’s proposed 1832 Compromise Tariff was rejected by South Carolina, who
prepared for military action
, March 1833, Jackson passed the ‘Force Bill’, which enabled the federal government
to use military force to enforce federal legislation
The 1833 tariff was consequently accepted
o Impact:
The government’s willingness to use military force was a blatant suppression of
states’ rights
Showed that Congress was Northern biased, which by nature undermined the
democracy of the Union
Indian Removal Act
o Jackson saw the 125,000 native Indians as impeding westward expansion and Manifest
Destiny
o Changed the policy of assimilation (Indians adopting US customs) to one of removal
o Forced relocation down the ‘Trail of Tears’
o Vast native casualties due to no government assistance – 4000 of the 15,000 Cherokee
members died
o Used military force – Black Hawk War (1832)
o The whole ordeal was coercive and completely counter to the democratic principles the
Union was founded upon
Conclusion
Jackson laid the foundations for democratisation on a national stage, and set the precedent
for partisanship and elections
“In structure and ideology, American politics had been democratised” – Gienapp (1982)
The Second Great Awakening and social reform in the North (1820s40s)
The Second Great Awakening:
An evangelist religious reformation that spread across New England and the Northeast that
sparked an atmosphere of widespread desire for social reform and liberalism (revivalism)
Education reform:
Horace Mann in his Twelfth Report argued that:
o Education gave the poor the tools to fight the rich and eliminate the class system
o Education promotes industrialisation and advancement
Mann’s report in 1848 embodied the Northern sentiment that education was vital to
modernisation, and their focus on it polarised them further from the South
Why did Northern education reform unsettle the South?
o An educated North posed a threat to the South’s institutions, as they would press
moral charges against slavery
o The South didn’t want high quality education leaking into Southern society, as (a) it
wasn’t necessary for agrarianism, and (b) they were worried that blacks and slaves would
become educated
o The South therefore felt threatened by the prospect of education and possible
subversion
Reform for women:
Women – especially in the South – were not respected the same as men, and had no right to vote
o They were “civilly dead” once married (Syracuse Recorder, 1848)
William Lloyd Garrison led the campaign for women’s rights, and his paper ‘Liberty’
demanded voting and societal reform – Sarah Grimke also led the cause
Why did reform for women unsettle the South?
o Fears that women’s rights would set the precedent for black rights