CITI Training Questions And Answers

CITI Training Questions And Answers Three principles of Belmont Report - ANS Respect for Persons Beneficence Justice The Belmont Report Principle of Beneficence - ANS MAXIMIZATION of benefits and MINIMIZATION of risks T/F Belmont Report indicates it is necessary to rigorously avoid conflicts of interest - ANS TRUE The Belmont Report Respect for Person - ANS Requires that subjects freely choose to participate in research (voluntariness) and that they are adequately informed about a study (informed consent) The Belmont Report defines and delineates... - ANS "Practice" and "Research" The Belmont Report The Principle of Justice - ANS Research benefit and burden distribution and that selection of subjects is fair. T/F The Belmont report describes the necessity to effectively manage conflicts of interest - ANS FALSE Students in Research The history of ethical regulations in human subjects research began with the - ANS Nuremberg Code Nuremberg Code - ANS Human subjects research guidelines and regulations Year of the Nuremberg Code - ANS 1949 Additional resources regarding IRB approval process - ANS Faculty advisor/Research Mentor IRB office Human subjects research websites What element must be included in an informed consent? - ANS All foreseeable risks and discomforts Which type of IRB review does not require and IRB approval but DOES require a Determination by the IRB? - ANS If the study qualifies for EXEMPTION Another name for the "Exempt" status - ANS the Common Rule stated in Title 45 Part 46 Subpart A How can faculty researchers avoid coercion of student subjects? - ANS Avoid using their own students in their research Name the type of Review: Research study that involves use of educational tests, survey, interviews, or observations of public behavior without identifiable information. - ANS Exempt Review category 2 Name the type of review: A study involving data collected that could have an impact on human subject's careers and it contains identifiers of the subjects. - ANS Full Board Review