Task 5 Or g nNurture
earn ng Goals
1 How stemperaturerelatedto aggress on
2 How s rac sm relatedto aggress on ngroupvs out group
3 Howdoespresence of weapons ncrease aggress on
4 Howdoes anonym ty effectaggress on
5 Howdoes ch ldhood maltreatment d sc pl n ng effectaggress on
6 Howdoesv olentmed a nfluence aggress on
EMPERATURE Heat v olence Anderason
heheathypothes s hot temperatures ncrease aggress ve mot vat on undercerta n cond t ons behav or
he neateffect observat on of h gher ratesof aggress on by people who are not relat vetopeoplewhoare
cold
esearchaboutheat aggress on can be stud ed n 3 forms
a f eldstud es
b labstud es w a focus on aggress on
c labstud es w a focus on aggress on relatedvar ables host lefeel ngs arousal bel efs
Id stud es
a stud es compar ng geograph creg ons
v olentcr merates are h gher n the south n Un tedStates s m lar nEurope aswell
Theeffectof southerness wasmeasured wh lecontroll ng fortemperature populat ons ze Ses ofthec t es
result pos t ve pathcoeff c ent forthel nkbetween temperature v olentcr me
b stud escompar ngt meper ods
Aggress ve hornhonk ng ncreasedathottertemperatures onlyforthecarsw thout a crond t on ng
F eldexper ment Dutchpol ces Burglaryscenar os mulat on nHot or comfortable cond t ons
Hotcond t on off cersweremoreaggress ve andthreat n ng
T mostf eld stud es are correlat onal
T two challenges to theneathypothes s changes nrout neact v t es southern culture
boratory stud es
The negat ve affect escape model
excess ve neat T aggress on whenthe total amount of negat ve affect a personexper ences s nthe low
thef ghtresponse
to moderaterange but that excess ve heat to aggress on when total negat ve
affectgetstooh gh thefl ghtresponse
when people'sattent on s notfocusedon temperature t ncreasesaggress on even e
factors are present
m
pggtngepggy.gg
Thethree of the
General
process cogn t veaffect
Be ng uncomfortable changes percept on crank ness not on arousal
m nor nsultsmaybeperce ved as major d
d rect nd rec
compat ble w thsoc alpsye cogn t veneo assoc at ontheory exc tat ontransfer theory
Behav oral scr ptmodel
i i
, ACISM n group outgroupread ng
d spos t onal
only react veAggress on gfactors
D splacedAggress on thetarget s nnocent wrongplaceatthewrongt me there
provoff nt sprovocat
nkh on
occurswhen a personcan'taggressor constra nedfrom aggress ng aga nstthesource of
D splaced aggress on maybed rectedaga nst nd v duals whothe aggressor perce vesd ss m larcoutgroupmembers
out groupstatus s assoc ated w negat v ty Therefore t m ght act vatenetworkof aggress onrelatedthoughts
emot ons behav ors n semant cmemory
stronger the d ss m lar ty h gherthelevel of d splaced aggress onmaybe
STUDY
Exam newhether Dutchmajor ty youths aremorel kely to exh b t d splaced aggress onaga nstArabethn c
m nor ty out grouppeers moroccanyouths
Part c pantswereDutchyouthsrandomlyass gned to rel eve e ther negat ve orneutral peer feedbackfrom
other samegender same ageDutchyouths
Theywereprov ded w the opportun ty to aggress aga nstfour un nvolved peers 2Dutch 2morrocon
Aggress on was measured w po ntsubtract on aggress onParad gm
Part c pants were told that they were gonna compete n an nternet game surv vor
they createdaccountsandJudgesgavefeedback onthe rprof le negat ve orneutral
Results
total aggress onh gher nthose who gotnegat vefeedback
Part c pantswho rec evednegat vepeerfeedback d splayedh gherlevels ofd splacedaggress onaga nstmorrocantargets
contrary to expectat on morenegat veatt tudestowardMoroccanpeers d dn'tpred ctmore aggress on towards
Moroccantargets fromthequest onna re
WEAPONS
canJustsee ng a gun ncrease aggress on
Berkow tz LePage
Pa rswereevaluat ng eachothersperformance on a task
The evaluat ons werethe of stressful electr cal shockg ven rangedfrom e ed
one of the part c pant was an accompl ce of theexper menter
he e ther evaluatedthe part c pantsperformance w 7 shocks provocat on cond t on
or w no shocks no provocat on cond t on
Then thepart c pant evaluated the accompl ce'sperformance of shocks werethemeasureforaggress on
The part c pant were e ther seated at atablethat had a shotgun revolver on t or badm ntonrackets
There werealso a control group w no tems on thetable
result provoked part c pants whosawthegunsweremoreaggress ve Weapons Effect
h s current metaanalys s testswhether weaponshave a greatereffect on provokedpart c pantsthan on
unprovokedpart c pants
effectsotweaponsonagggs gg ghts gnarf sthost leappra sals
AM General aggress on model
2 nputs personal s tuat onal
Th s metaanalys s focuses on 3 personal nputs gender age whetherwerecollegestudents or not
on 2 s tuat onal nputs exposure toweapon provocat on
Accord ng to 6am personal s tuat onal factors nfluence one's nternal state wh chcan ncludeaggress ve
cogn t on aggress veaffect phys olog calarousallevels
I
i i
i ii
i i
earn ng Goals
1 How stemperaturerelatedto aggress on
2 How s rac sm relatedto aggress on ngroupvs out group
3 Howdoespresence of weapons ncrease aggress on
4 Howdoes anonym ty effectaggress on
5 Howdoes ch ldhood maltreatment d sc pl n ng effectaggress on
6 Howdoesv olentmed a nfluence aggress on
EMPERATURE Heat v olence Anderason
heheathypothes s hot temperatures ncrease aggress ve mot vat on undercerta n cond t ons behav or
he neateffect observat on of h gher ratesof aggress on by people who are not relat vetopeoplewhoare
cold
esearchaboutheat aggress on can be stud ed n 3 forms
a f eldstud es
b labstud es w a focus on aggress on
c labstud es w a focus on aggress on relatedvar ables host lefeel ngs arousal bel efs
Id stud es
a stud es compar ng geograph creg ons
v olentcr merates are h gher n the south n Un tedStates s m lar nEurope aswell
Theeffectof southerness wasmeasured wh lecontroll ng fortemperature populat ons ze Ses ofthec t es
result pos t ve pathcoeff c ent forthel nkbetween temperature v olentcr me
b stud escompar ngt meper ods
Aggress ve hornhonk ng ncreasedathottertemperatures onlyforthecarsw thout a crond t on ng
F eldexper ment Dutchpol ces Burglaryscenar os mulat on nHot or comfortable cond t ons
Hotcond t on off cersweremoreaggress ve andthreat n ng
T mostf eld stud es are correlat onal
T two challenges to theneathypothes s changes nrout neact v t es southern culture
boratory stud es
The negat ve affect escape model
excess ve neat T aggress on whenthe total amount of negat ve affect a personexper ences s nthe low
thef ghtresponse
to moderaterange but that excess ve heat to aggress on when total negat ve
affectgetstooh gh thefl ghtresponse
when people'sattent on s notfocusedon temperature t ncreasesaggress on even e
factors are present
m
pggtngepggy.gg
Thethree of the
General
process cogn t veaffect
Be ng uncomfortable changes percept on crank ness not on arousal
m nor nsultsmaybeperce ved as major d
d rect nd rec
compat ble w thsoc alpsye cogn t veneo assoc at ontheory exc tat ontransfer theory
Behav oral scr ptmodel
i i
, ACISM n group outgroupread ng
d spos t onal
only react veAggress on gfactors
D splacedAggress on thetarget s nnocent wrongplaceatthewrongt me there
provoff nt sprovocat
nkh on
occurswhen a personcan'taggressor constra nedfrom aggress ng aga nstthesource of
D splaced aggress on maybed rectedaga nst nd v duals whothe aggressor perce vesd ss m larcoutgroupmembers
out groupstatus s assoc ated w negat v ty Therefore t m ght act vatenetworkof aggress onrelatedthoughts
emot ons behav ors n semant cmemory
stronger the d ss m lar ty h gherthelevel of d splaced aggress onmaybe
STUDY
Exam newhether Dutchmajor ty youths aremorel kely to exh b t d splaced aggress onaga nstArabethn c
m nor ty out grouppeers moroccanyouths
Part c pantswereDutchyouthsrandomlyass gned to rel eve e ther negat ve orneutral peer feedbackfrom
other samegender same ageDutchyouths
Theywereprov ded w the opportun ty to aggress aga nstfour un nvolved peers 2Dutch 2morrocon
Aggress on was measured w po ntsubtract on aggress onParad gm
Part c pants were told that they were gonna compete n an nternet game surv vor
they createdaccountsandJudgesgavefeedback onthe rprof le negat ve orneutral
Results
total aggress onh gher nthose who gotnegat vefeedback
Part c pantswho rec evednegat vepeerfeedback d splayedh gherlevels ofd splacedaggress onaga nstmorrocantargets
contrary to expectat on morenegat veatt tudestowardMoroccanpeers d dn'tpred ctmore aggress on towards
Moroccantargets fromthequest onna re
WEAPONS
canJustsee ng a gun ncrease aggress on
Berkow tz LePage
Pa rswereevaluat ng eachothersperformance on a task
The evaluat ons werethe of stressful electr cal shockg ven rangedfrom e ed
one of the part c pant was an accompl ce of theexper menter
he e ther evaluatedthe part c pantsperformance w 7 shocks provocat on cond t on
or w no shocks no provocat on cond t on
Then thepart c pant evaluated the accompl ce'sperformance of shocks werethemeasureforaggress on
The part c pant were e ther seated at atablethat had a shotgun revolver on t or badm ntonrackets
There werealso a control group w no tems on thetable
result provoked part c pants whosawthegunsweremoreaggress ve Weapons Effect
h s current metaanalys s testswhether weaponshave a greatereffect on provokedpart c pantsthan on
unprovokedpart c pants
effectsotweaponsonagggs gg ghts gnarf sthost leappra sals
AM General aggress on model
2 nputs personal s tuat onal
Th s metaanalys s focuses on 3 personal nputs gender age whetherwerecollegestudents or not
on 2 s tuat onal nputs exposure toweapon provocat on
Accord ng to 6am personal s tuat onal factors nfluence one's nternal state wh chcan ncludeaggress ve
cogn t on aggress veaffect phys olog calarousallevels
I
i i
i ii
i i
