Rights in Context 1.4
Shamima Begum, Collective vs Abu Qatada 2012 , Civil RIghts Abu Hamza 2012 , Civil Rights Child Q, 2020 - individual vs
Individual 2019 , Civil Rights collective , Civil Rights
- Wanted to return to the UK - Claims asylum to the UK in 1993 under - 2004 arrested for suspicion of terrorism - 15yrs old, black girl strip searched with
- EXECUTIVE, 2019 Denied UK a forged passport - After 2 months he was charged with 15 no consent under suspicion of
citizenship, Sajid David Home - 1999, advocates for killing of jews and o ences , was found guilty of all by possession of drugs
Secretary praises attacks on Americans in a British court - Parents not presented, girl strip
- “Threat to national security” speech in London - Article 6, right to fair trial , right to not be searched in school, pulled out of mock
- Article 3 of HRA, no one to subjected to detained exam
torture or inhumane treatment - Article 7, no punishment without law - No teacher was informed of the search
- LEGISLATIVE, HRA 1998 failed to - 2005, arrested under immigration rules. - 2007, Court allowed for his extradition - JUDICIARY, policewomen investigated
protect Begum Government seeks to deport him to the US, he appealed this decision to for Gross Misconduct Charges - no nal
- Fundamental right to not be left - Court of Appeal rules deportation will the ECHR charge was given. Court hearing yet to
stateless breach his human rights, evidence to be - ECHR temporarily blocked his begin
- British Nationality Act 1981, being left used against him in Jordan obtained extradition in 2010 until the court was - EXECUTIVE, police part of branch,
stateless is unlawful , Executive through torture reassured he would not be subject to Metropolitan police investigated case,
supported by the LEGISLATIVE - under - Rearrested in 2008 after Home O ce torture under HRA no info on consequences
a clause, able to remove Status tells immigration of fears of Qatada - 2012, High Court agreed to the - LEGISLATIVE, Equality Act 2010,
- No permanent protection, uncodi ed eeing extradition to face terrorism charges HRA1998,
and not entrenched, uncodi ed UK - JUDICIARY , unanimously backs gov - 2014, life in prison without parole in the - Sexual O ence Act 2003, child Q
Constitution policy of removing terror suspects, ruled US exposed in indecent manner
- Begum and lawyers not been able to that Qatada can be deported to face - 2020, The Times reported of a lawsuit - Children Act 1989, police protect
virtual join Court hearings terror charges by Hamas of inhumane treatment - children from harm
- Cannot ef ciently ght for her rights, - 2012, ECHR states he can be sent back solitary con nement, removal of his - Right to personal freedom, child and
freedom to speech and fair trial but he cannot be deported while the risk prosthetics and ignored oral hygiene parents gave no consent
- JUDICIARY, ruled unanimously against of torture remains - HRA Article 14, protection from - Right to Education, Child Q pulled out of
her in 2021 to return to appeal Home - UK had to sign a treaty with Jordan to discrimination mock exam
Secretary's decision prevent this (2013). Abu Qatada was - The head of the US prison service said - Right to prohibition of torcher and
cleared of involvement in terrorist bomb the lawsuit should be rejected by the degrading
plots in Jordan but still viewed as a justice system, described complaints as - Freedom against unwarranted searches,
threat by British. ‘ambiguous’ police o cers had no warrant for strip
search
Hirst vs UK 2005 Right to Vote , Rights are Protected in the UK Al Jedda
Democratic Rights
fl ff
ffifffi fi fi fi ffifi fi
Shamima Begum, Collective vs Abu Qatada 2012 , Civil RIghts Abu Hamza 2012 , Civil Rights Child Q, 2020 - individual vs
Individual 2019 , Civil Rights collective , Civil Rights
- Wanted to return to the UK - Claims asylum to the UK in 1993 under - 2004 arrested for suspicion of terrorism - 15yrs old, black girl strip searched with
- EXECUTIVE, 2019 Denied UK a forged passport - After 2 months he was charged with 15 no consent under suspicion of
citizenship, Sajid David Home - 1999, advocates for killing of jews and o ences , was found guilty of all by possession of drugs
Secretary praises attacks on Americans in a British court - Parents not presented, girl strip
- “Threat to national security” speech in London - Article 6, right to fair trial , right to not be searched in school, pulled out of mock
- Article 3 of HRA, no one to subjected to detained exam
torture or inhumane treatment - Article 7, no punishment without law - No teacher was informed of the search
- LEGISLATIVE, HRA 1998 failed to - 2005, arrested under immigration rules. - 2007, Court allowed for his extradition - JUDICIARY, policewomen investigated
protect Begum Government seeks to deport him to the US, he appealed this decision to for Gross Misconduct Charges - no nal
- Fundamental right to not be left - Court of Appeal rules deportation will the ECHR charge was given. Court hearing yet to
stateless breach his human rights, evidence to be - ECHR temporarily blocked his begin
- British Nationality Act 1981, being left used against him in Jordan obtained extradition in 2010 until the court was - EXECUTIVE, police part of branch,
stateless is unlawful , Executive through torture reassured he would not be subject to Metropolitan police investigated case,
supported by the LEGISLATIVE - under - Rearrested in 2008 after Home O ce torture under HRA no info on consequences
a clause, able to remove Status tells immigration of fears of Qatada - 2012, High Court agreed to the - LEGISLATIVE, Equality Act 2010,
- No permanent protection, uncodi ed eeing extradition to face terrorism charges HRA1998,
and not entrenched, uncodi ed UK - JUDICIARY , unanimously backs gov - 2014, life in prison without parole in the - Sexual O ence Act 2003, child Q
Constitution policy of removing terror suspects, ruled US exposed in indecent manner
- Begum and lawyers not been able to that Qatada can be deported to face - 2020, The Times reported of a lawsuit - Children Act 1989, police protect
virtual join Court hearings terror charges by Hamas of inhumane treatment - children from harm
- Cannot ef ciently ght for her rights, - 2012, ECHR states he can be sent back solitary con nement, removal of his - Right to personal freedom, child and
freedom to speech and fair trial but he cannot be deported while the risk prosthetics and ignored oral hygiene parents gave no consent
- JUDICIARY, ruled unanimously against of torture remains - HRA Article 14, protection from - Right to Education, Child Q pulled out of
her in 2021 to return to appeal Home - UK had to sign a treaty with Jordan to discrimination mock exam
Secretary's decision prevent this (2013). Abu Qatada was - The head of the US prison service said - Right to prohibition of torcher and
cleared of involvement in terrorist bomb the lawsuit should be rejected by the degrading
plots in Jordan but still viewed as a justice system, described complaints as - Freedom against unwarranted searches,
threat by British. ‘ambiguous’ police o cers had no warrant for strip
search
Hirst vs UK 2005 Right to Vote , Rights are Protected in the UK Al Jedda
Democratic Rights
fl ff
ffifffi fi fi fi ffifi fi
