PDU3701 Assignment 3 (QUALITY ANSWERS) 2024

This document contains workings, explanations and solutions to the PDU3701 Assignment 3 (QUALITY ANSWERS) 2024. For assistance call or Whats-App us on 0.6.8..8.1.2..0.9.3.4..................Question 1: Name TWO philosophers who were associated with Phenomenology (Refer to pages 62-63 of Philosophy in Education Today: An Introduction) (4) Question 2: Identify FIVE characteristics of Phenomenology (Refer to pages 64 of Philosophy in Education Today: An Introduction) (10) Question 3: Name THREE educators who are associated with Phenomenology (Refer to pages 66-68 of Philosophy in Education Today: An Introduction for the answer) (6) Question 4: How does Phenomenology respond to formal education systems? (Refer to page 70 of Philosophy in Education Today: An Introduction for the answer) (10) Question 5: What can Phenomenology help us to achieve in education? (Refer to page 71 of Philosophy in Education Today: An Introduction for the answer) (10) Question 6: Indicate whether the following statements are true or false and provide your answer with an explanation. 6.1 Phenomenology examines things and people by imposing theories and opinions on reality. 6.2 Phenomenology focuses on our felt experience of reality rather than on a scientific analysis of experience. 6.3 Phenomenology is concerned with a description of what is essentially human. 6.4 Phenomenology believes that theories about us and about life can be very misleading and may lead to falsehood. 6.5 Phenomenology is deeply concerned about the impact of formal, prescriptive education systems on young children. (10) [50] Question 7: Essay Read chapter 3 on Scientific Rationalism and Philosophy of Education. Reflect on the conception of knowledge, or knowledges. Write an essay on who ought to determine the type of knowledge that is worth pursuing. The essay will be assessed as follows: 1. Title of essay 5 2. Introduction 10 3. Body 20 4. Conclusion 10 5. References 51.1 Which legal system applies to the material validity of the marriage according to the principles of South African private international law? (2) 1.2 Mrs Hendricks gave Mr Hendricks a BMW X5 vehicle (fully paid in cash by Mrs Hendricks) in 2016. After the divorce proceedings were instituted, Mrs Hendricks disputed the validity of this gift / donation. In terms of English law, donations between spouses are regarded as a proprietary consequence of marriage but in terms of South African law, donations between spouses are classified as a personal consequence of marriage. 1.2.1 Which legal system will be applied to the validity of the gift if the via media approach to classification is used? Motivate your answer, but you do NOT have to provide the classification tables. 1.2.2 Assume for purposes of 1.2.2 that gifts between spouses are classified as a personal consequence under English law and as a proprietary consequence under South African law. If the via media approach to classification is followed once again, which legal system would be applied to the validity of the gifts between the spouses? PROVIDE CLASSIFICATION TABLES (12) 1.3 Assume that the rules of private international law of the lex loci celebrationis of the Henricks’ marriage refer the determination of formal validity of the marriage to the lex domicilii matrimonii (domicile of the husband at the time of entering into the marriage) and that the lex domicilii matrimonii refers the determination of the formal validity back to the place of marriage celebration. If the South African court follows a partial renvoi approach, which legal system will it apply to the formal validity of the marriage in question? (3