Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 3 out of 19 pages
Exam (elaborations)

AQA A-level POLITICS Paper 2 Government and politics of the USA and Comparative Politics |with Mark Scheme

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 3 out of 19 pages

AQA A-level POLITICS Paper 2 Government and politics of the USA and Comparative Politics with Mark Scheme

Content preview

A-level
POLITICS
Paper 2 Government and politics of the USA and Comparative Politics


Thursday 4 June 2020 Morning Time allowed: 2 hours

Materials
For this paper you must have:
 an AQA 12-page answer book.

Instructions
 Use black ink or black ball-point pen.
 Write the information required on the front of your answer book. The Paper Reference is 7152/2.
 Answer all questions from Section A and Section B.
 Answer either Question 5 or Question 6 from Section C.
 Do all rough work in your answer book. Cross through any work you do not want to be marked.
 If you use more than one answer book, check that you have written the information required on
each book.

Information
 The marks for questions are shown in brackets.
 The maximum mark for this paper is 77.




IB/G/Jun20/E8 7152/2

, 2


Section A – US Government, politics and comparative theory

Answer questions 1, 2 and 3.



0 1 Explain and analyse three roles performed by US congressional committees.
[9 marks]


0 2 Explain and analyse three ways in which the US political system encourages
pressure group activity.
[9 marks]


0 3 Explain and analyse three ways that rational theory could be used to explain
voting behaviour in the US and UK.
[9 marks]




IB/G/Jun20/7152/2

, 3


Section B – Extract Question

Read the extracts below and answer question 4 that follows.



Is the Supreme Court a politicised institution?

The appointment of a Supreme Court Justice is an event of major significance in American politics.

Congressional Research Service Report, June 2018 (a report prepared for members of
Congress) on the Supreme Court Appointment Process.

Each appointment is of consequence because of the enormous judicial power the Supreme Court
exercises as the highest appellate court in the federal judiciary. Under the US Constitution,
Justices on the Supreme Court receive what can amount to lifetime appointments which, by
constitutional design, helps ensure the Court’s independence from the President and Congress.
The Senate through its “Advice and Consent” function acts as a safeguard on the President’s
judgement. Closely related to the expectation that a Supreme Court nominee will have excellent
professional qualifications are the ideals of integrity and impartiality in a nominee. Accordingly,
Presidents will often cite such qualities, as President Obama did when announcing his nomination
of Judge Sonia Sotomayor to the Court, noting both her “mastery of the law” and “a commitment to
impartial justice”.


Extract from Congressional Research Service Report, June 2018


Who are the Federalist Society? How a group of conservative law students have come to
dominate the judicial nomination process, by Sophie McBain, North American
correspondent for the New Statesman (a centre-left UK political magazine), September
2018.

Brett Kavanaugh, the newest Supreme Court Justice, is one of five of the nine Supreme Court
justices who are members of the Federalist Society. The Society is made up of lawyers who
promote a strict constructionist view of the US Constitution. Its first advisers were Robert Bork and
Antonin Scalia who were nominated by President Reagan. In 2018 the Trump administration
asked the Society to draw up a list of potential Supreme Court nominees for the president’s
consideration, which included Kavanaugh. Steven Teles, the author of Rise of the Conservative
Legal Movement: The Battle for Control of the Law has argued Trump effectively gave the task of
filling the vacancy to the Federalist Society. Teles says that ‘it used to be that Senators played an
important role in judicial appointments’ but by doing so Trump could be sure the Federalist Society
would put forward people who appeal to his social conservative base.


Extract from www.newstatesman.com



0 4 Analyse, evaluate and compare the different arguments in the above extracts regarding
the extent to which the US Supreme Court is a politicised institution.
[25 marks]

Turn over for the next question



IB/G/Jun20/7152/2

Document information

Study Level
Subject
Uploaded on
May 15, 2022
Number of pages
19
Written in
2022/2023
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
$13.99

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
keenstar
4.8
(561)
Sold
825
Followers
518
Items
1998
Last sold
6 months ago

Reviews from verified buyers




Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions