Exam (elaborations) NR 511 PEER REVIEWER JESSICA FIEHLER

Exam (elaborations) NR 511 PEER REVIEWER JESSICA FIEHLER R 511 PEER REVIEWER JESSICA FIEHLER NR511 Peer Review Template and 4) Identifies the typical clinical presentation seen in a patient with the disease (4 critical elements). the typical clinical presentation seen in a patient with the disease. Jessica presented eight (4 critical elements must be noted) different typical ways AOE could present in the clinical setting. Publication & Applicability in Primary Care The student: 1) Identifies the author, organization or group that developed the CPG, 2) Student denotes the year of the original guideline publication, 3) Student identifies any subsequent revisions (student’s reference should be the most recent version), and 4) Student discusses the 30 Points 26 Points 24 Points 12 Points 0 Points Student correctly identifies the author(s), organization(s), or group(s) that developed the CPG AND Student states the year of the original CPG guideline AND Student notes all subsequent revisions of the guideline (with the student’s version being the most recent) AND Student discusses how this CPG is All four (4) critical elements are present but some information may be only partially addressed or inaccurate. -2 critical elements are missing -3 critical elements are missing All four (4) critical elements are missing. All 9 authors were recognized, that published this CPG along with the organization (American Academy of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery Foundation). She stated the original date of the published guideline (2014) and when it was last updated (2006). Also added that this CPG was reviewed and updated every 5 years, the next time being 2019. Applicability was noted on the same slide, as being applicable to the PC setting because of how common it is and the volume of patient seen every year. I really like your session on application to primary care since you included very good points like that the differentiation between bacterial, fungi and dermatological is very often the and appropriate use of oral and topical antibiotics. Also including special considerations and high-risk population. Great Job All 30 points were awarded for this section. This study source was downloaded by from CourseH on :45:54 GMT -05:00 This study resource was shared via CourseH NR511 Peer Review Template applicability for use of this CPG in the primary care setting (4 critical elements). applicable to primary care. Key Action Statements & Body of Evidence The student: 1)Provides each of the CPG’s “Key Action” or “Guideline Statements” up to a maximum of 5 relevant recommendations , 2) Provides the body of evidence strength for each, and 3) If the statement has applicability to other groups, only discuss the relevant primary care ones (3 critical elements). 45 Points 39 Points 37 Points 18 Points 0 Points Student presents a maximum of 5 relevant recommendation s AND Student denotes the evidence strength for EACH recommendation AND Student discusses ONLY the ones applicable to primary care - All three (3) critical elements are addressed but some information may be only partially addressed, or not completely accurate -1 critical element is missing -2 critical elements are missing All three (3) critical elements are missing I think you did a great job presenting all main points of your CPG and you provided the strength of evidence for each recommendation. Good job selecting the recommendations more applicable to primary care. There were 8 different key action statements identified with a grading for each one and if it were recommended or not recommended. 5 of 8 the key actions were applicable in the clinical setting. All 45 points awarded for this section. Identified action statements from CPG 5 out of 8 were addressed 1. Modify management for diffuse AOE 2. Not prescribing antimicrobials as initial therapy 3. Use of topical preparations for initial therapy 4. Nontoxic agents should be ordered if TM is compromised 5. Failure of initial therapeutic option with in 48-72 hours This study source was downloaded by from CourseH on :45:54 GMT -05:00 This study resource was shared via CourseH NR511 Peer Review Template Application in Clinical 1) Using an example of a patient from their clinical rotation with the same condition, 2) Student discusses how the diagnosis and treatment of their patient compared to the recommendations given in the guidelines, and 3). Specific examples of what was done well or what could have been done better is noted (3 critical elements). 45 Points 39 Points 37 Points 18 Points 0 Points -The student uses a patient example from their clinical setting with the same condition AND -The student discusses how the diagnosis & treatment of their patient compared to those recommended in the guideline AND -specific examples are given on what was done well or what could have been done better -All 3 critical elements are addressed but some information may only be partially addressed -1 critical element is missing -2 critical elements are missing All three (3) critical elements are missing Jessica gave an example of 48-year-old female patient seen in her clinical rotation. She discussed how the diagnosis and treatment plan followed the CPG with recommendations. She noted that the diagnosis and treatment plan were in alignment with the recommend CPG and that there was nothing that should have been different or better. Three critical elements were addresses, but I felt like she could have given less data on a few slides due to crowding Slides were organized and, very easy to understand , Reference slide was given, . I think you did a great comparison between your patient and your CPG. Good job explaining what was done right about your patient. Content Subtotal _____of 150 points Format Possible Points = 15 Points Presentation 15 Points 13 Points 12 Points 6 Points 0 Points This study source was downloaded by from CourseH on :45:54 GMT -05:00 This study resource was shared via CourseH NR511 Peer Review Templat