NURS 602 Applying Critical Reflective Practice Research Examples

NURS 602 Applying Critical Reflective Practice Research ExamplesNURS 602 Applying Critical Reflective Practice Research Examples Example 1 UBG331 Applying Critical Reflective Practice Part A Aim and Context Human Resource professionals face an environment that is “complex, uncertain and changeable” (Gardner 2009), as I have experienced this within areas of a Management role and faced with this perception, I still wish to pursue a career within HR. The aim and purpose of this research is to explore whether my maternity (trigger) was the influence that led me to my career crossroad of leaving my job and undertaking an undergraduate degree. To discover this, my research context is framed around the professional body of Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD). My reasoning for this is because CIPD are known for setting the professional benchmark in HR whilst being a highly recognised accreditation. I am able to identify a deeper understanding about them from their vision and purpose, which is to; “Define, improve and represent practices in people and organisation development to benefit individuals, businesses, economies and society” (Our purpose, vision and mission - About us - CIPD, 2016). Using the CIPD Profession Map I am able to demonstrate through active imagination a diagnosis of why these three behaviors; Curious, Courage to Challenge and Driven to Deliver ("Behaviours | CIPD") describe my maternity trigger and most describe my HR journey and experience so far. Importantly, Pettica-Harris and McKenna (2013) argues that a professional person may have choices in which career path they take but will face struggles at the heart of discovering professional knowledge. This is due to CIPD’s own knowledge in action framework ("Profession Map For HR And L&D | CIPD") which shape’s and moulds professionals to be specific behaviours of what they have to ‘be’ (du Gay, 1994; McKenna, 2010 cited in Peticca‐Harris and McKenna, 2013, pg.823). This draws internal identity conversations of ‘Inside’ work (Peticca‐ Harris and McKenna, 2013) such as questions of; “Who am I? What should I be? How should I be it?” (Archer, 2003 cited in Peticca‐Harris and McKenna, 2013 pg. 824).