• Wrong document? Swap it for free
  • Written by students who passed
  • Immediately available after payment
  • Read online or as PDF
Sell
Where do you study
Your language
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 1 out of 164 pages
Exam (elaborations)

LEV3701 Exam Pack 2026

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 1 out of 164 pages

Law of Evidence - LEV3701 Latest exam pack questions and answers and summarized notes for exam preparation. For assistance call or W.h.a.t.s.a.p.p us on +/ 2/ 5/ 4 /7 /7 /9 /5 /4 /0 /1 /3 /2 .

Content preview

LEV3701
EXAM PACK

,LEV3701 – LAW OF EVIDENCE

PRCATICE Q&A OCTBER/NOVEMBER

SECTION 1

Question 1

Consider the statements below and select the correct option:

1. Photographs, wills, books and drawings can all be classified as forms of
documentary evidence.
2. Section 233 of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 permits certified copies of
public documents to be admitted in civil proceedings, provided the prescribed
requirements are satisfied.
3. A title deed and a baptismal certificate are examples of public documents.
4. A subpoena duces tecum is generally used in civil and criminal proceedings to
compel the production of specified documents.

Question 2

During cross-examination:

1. It is never permissible to question an accused about offences other than the
offence with which he or she is charged.
2. The cross-examiner may ask leading questions and may also question the
witness on matters relevant solely to credibility.
3. It is always permissible to question an accused about other offences that are
unrelated to the charge being faced.
4. It is permissible to attack the character of an accused without restriction.

Question 3

,In relation to documentary evidence, a copy of a person's identity document is best
classified as:

1. Secondary evidence.
2. Hearsay evidence.
3. Indirect evidence.
4. Primary evidence.

Question 4

Public documents:

a. Constitute an exception to the hearsay rule.
b. Are protected by private privilege.
c. Include every document that is not a private document.
d. Must comply with the hearsay rule where the contents of the document are in dispute.

Question 5

Consider the following statements concerning admissions and confessions and select
the correct option:

1. A statement intended to be exculpatory may nevertheless amount to an
admission where its ultimate effect is detrimental to the person who made it.
2. By definition, confessions can also arise in civil proceedings.
3. In S v Grove-Mitchell 1975 (3) SA 417 (A), the statement, “I shot her full of holes,
I emptied the gun on her”, constitutes a confession.
4. Informal admissions are described as such because they are always made
outside court and before the commencement of a trial.

Question 6

Consider the following propositions concerning marital privilege and identify the correct
option:

, 1. During a domestic-violence incident, a husband points a firearm at his wife and
states that he intends to kill her and their children. If criminal proceedings follow,
the wife may be compelled to testify about the pointing of the firearm but may
refuse to disclose what her husband said to her.
2. Marital privilege applies to communications made during the marriage, but once
the spouses divorce, the privilege no longer protects communications made while
they were married.
3. A third party who overhears a conversation between spouses is prohibited from
giving evidence about that conversation in court.
4. Marital privilege belongs to the person who made the particular communication.

Question 7

A kills his wife's lover in her presence and is subsequently charged with murder. A's
wife is called as a witness. She is:

1. Merely an identifying witness.
2. Both an identifying witness and a single witness.
3. Incompetent to testify for the State.
4. Merely a single witness.

Question 8

A bank is robbed and the police later discover metal containers holding money in a
ditch. The containers are identified as those stolen from the bank. Several days later,
the accused is arrested and makes a confession implicating himself in the robbery. The
confession does not satisfy the admissibility requirements of section 217 of the Criminal
Procedure Act 51 of 1977. After making the confession, the accused leads the police to
the ditch and identifies the location where the money was hidden.

Select the correct statement:

Connected book
 image
Nicola Monaghan Law of Evidence
Publisher: 2015 ISBN: 9781316298367 Edition: Unknown

Document information

Uploaded on
October 14, 2026
Number of pages
164
Written in
2026/2027
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
$4.68

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
LIBvault
4.0
(18)
Sold
153
Followers
1
Items
287
Last sold
20 hours ago



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions