Page 1 of 12
, Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 3
QUESTION 1 ............................................................................................................. 3
1.1 Understanding the Principles of Justice and Fairness in Research about Women
................................................................................................................................ 3
1.1.1 The Traditional Scope of Justice and Its Feminist Critique ......................... 3
1.1.2 Fairness as Responsiveness to Intersecting Oppressions ......................... 4
1.1.3 Epistemic Justice and the Co-Production of Knowledge ............................ 4
1.2 Discuss the Ethical Risks in Research Regarding the Representation of Women
................................................................................................................................ 4
1.2.1 The Risk of Overgeneralisation and Essentialism ...................................... 4
1.2.2 The Risk of Silencing Through "Vulnerability" Assumptions ....................... 5
1.2.3 Representational Power and Asymmetries in Knowledge Production ........ 5
1.3 Critically Illustrating How the Ethical Risks Identified in 1.2 Could Be Mitigated6
1.3.1 Mitigating Overgeneralisation Through Intersectional and Reflexive Design
............................................................................................................................ 6
1.3.2 Mitigating Silencing Through Trauma-Informed and Participatory
Approaches ......................................................................................................... 6
1.3.3 Mitigating Representational Harm Through Epistemic Accountability ........ 7
QUESTION 2 ............................................................................................................. 8
2.1 Justifying the Testing of Validity and Reliability in a Quantitative Instrument .... 8
2.1.1 The Contemporary View of Validity as Unified and Contextual................... 8
2.1.2 Reliability as Consistency of Measurement ................................................ 8
2.1.3 Practical Procedures for Validation and Pilot Testing ................................. 9
2.2 Do You Agree or Disagree with the Author’s Justification of the Low Response
Rate? ...................................................................................................................... 9
2.2.1 The Author’s Justification and Its Scholarly Basis ...................................... 9
2.2.2 Points of Agreement: The Contextual Reality of Online Survey Research . 9
2.2.3 Points of Disagreement: The Limits of the Justification ............................ 10
2.2.4 Conclusion ............................................................................................... 10
Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 11
Page 2 of 12
, Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 3
QUESTION 1 ............................................................................................................. 3
1.1 Understanding the Principles of Justice and Fairness in Research about Women
................................................................................................................................ 3
1.1.1 The Traditional Scope of Justice and Its Feminist Critique ......................... 3
1.1.2 Fairness as Responsiveness to Intersecting Oppressions ......................... 4
1.1.3 Epistemic Justice and the Co-Production of Knowledge ............................ 4
1.2 Discuss the Ethical Risks in Research Regarding the Representation of Women
................................................................................................................................ 4
1.2.1 The Risk of Overgeneralisation and Essentialism ...................................... 4
1.2.2 The Risk of Silencing Through "Vulnerability" Assumptions ....................... 5
1.2.3 Representational Power and Asymmetries in Knowledge Production ........ 5
1.3 Critically Illustrating How the Ethical Risks Identified in 1.2 Could Be Mitigated6
1.3.1 Mitigating Overgeneralisation Through Intersectional and Reflexive Design
............................................................................................................................ 6
1.3.2 Mitigating Silencing Through Trauma-Informed and Participatory
Approaches ......................................................................................................... 6
1.3.3 Mitigating Representational Harm Through Epistemic Accountability ........ 7
QUESTION 2 ............................................................................................................. 8
2.1 Justifying the Testing of Validity and Reliability in a Quantitative Instrument .... 8
2.1.1 The Contemporary View of Validity as Unified and Contextual................... 8
2.1.2 Reliability as Consistency of Measurement ................................................ 8
2.1.3 Practical Procedures for Validation and Pilot Testing ................................. 9
2.2 Do You Agree or Disagree with the Author’s Justification of the Low Response
Rate? ...................................................................................................................... 9
2.2.1 The Author’s Justification and Its Scholarly Basis ...................................... 9
2.2.2 Points of Agreement: The Contextual Reality of Online Survey Research . 9
2.2.3 Points of Disagreement: The Limits of the Justification ............................ 10
2.2.4 Conclusion ............................................................................................... 10
Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 11
Page 2 of 12
