• Wrong document? Swap it for free
  • Written by students who passed
  • Immediately available after payment
  • Read online or as PDF
Sell
Where do you study
Your language
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 6 pages
Essay

Slavery in Spanish New World and Ottoman Empire

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 6 pages

Comparison and contrast between slavery in the Spanish New World and Ottoman Empire.

Content preview

Morgan Clelland

HIST 457 – Comparative Empires

Question Two

Empires are complex entities where the central state exerts sovereignty over peripheral

states that are not seen as an integral part of the central state. When studying the operation of

these empires, numerous characteristics must be considered and compared with one another. For

the Spanish New World and Ottoman Empires, slavery is one characteristic that presents itself

for meaningful comparison. Both empires obtained services through the provision of forced labor

and experienced the difficulties of incorporating enslaved workers into society. However, there

are unique aspects concerning the impact that slavery had upon each empire. Distinct features for

the Ottoman Empire included providing the enslaved with respect and opportunity for

advancement. Unique aspects for the Spanish New World Empire included carrying out the

process of slavery with brutal methods. In the end, the two empires should be regarded as similar

for building slavery upon previously existing institutions and never achieving full integration of

the enslaved, but also different for the treatment of the enslaved.


Slavery within the Ottoman Empire applied to people known as janissaries. Janissaries

were the best foot soldiers in the empire and came into imperial service by special requirement.

Imperial law allowed for the forcible recruitment of young male subjects outside of Islamic

religion into the service of the sultan. 1 It should be noted that the janissaries technically did not

fall under the category of slaves. Religious law provided no allowances for any subjects of the

sultan to become enslaved unless special circumstances applied. These special circumstances

entailed following another religion and rebelling against the government, which was not



1
Suraiya Faroqhi, The Ottoman Empire: A Short History (Princeton: Markus Werner Publishers, 2009), 47.

, something that anyone accused the janissaries of doing.2 To avoid the complexities of religious

law, Ottoman officials declared that the janissaries were people that the sultan specially

appointed for imperial service.3


Slavery within the Spanish New World Empire applied to the native populace under the

system of encomienda. The system granted settlers the right to demand labor service from Indian

chiefs who assigned groups of tribesmen for service as virtual slaves. 4 Encomienda itself was not

something entirely new for the settlers. The practice could be traced back to the times of

medieval Spain when peasants placed themselves under the protection of lords in exchange for

the provision of services.5 The system found its way into the New World when Columbus

allowed small numbers of settlers to exploit native labor during the early years of exploration.

The practice of encomienda expanded over time to include greater numbers of settlers and native

laborers under them. This expansion was significant for laying the foundations of extensive

debate over the treatment of the indigenous population.


The service of janissaries was important for building upon practices that had already been

in place. During medieval times, eastern rulers employed the tradition of using slaves or former

slaves under their authority for military functions. 6 This practice provided some justification for

the sultan when requiring the recruitment of young male subjects for janissary service. The claim

of following well established practices from the past could be asserted. In addition, the military

service of young children outside of Islamic religion was important for falling under imperial

efforts to strengthen the empire. Selecting these children removed the possibility that competing


2
Faroqhi, 48.
3
Faroqhi, 48.
4
William Maltby, The Rise and Fall of the Spanish Empire (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009), 27.
5
Maltby, 9.
6
Faroqhi, 48.

Document information

Uploaded on
October 6, 2026
Number of pages
6
Written in
2012/2013
Type
Essay
Professor(s)
Unknown
Grade
A
$3.49

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Sold
0
Followers
0
Items
43
Last sold
-




Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions