• Wrong document? Swap it for free
  • Written by students who passed
  • Immediately available after payment
  • Read online or as PDF
Sell
Where do you study
Your language
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 4 out of 37 pages
Exam (elaborations)

Wgu D385 Software Security And Testing Python Secure-Coding Practice Workbook Exercises And Capstones| Instant Download

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 4 out of 37 pages

This workbook gives you 40 Python secure-coding exercises and 4 capstones for WGU D385. Each question has four options, a keyed answer, and a clear rationale. Topics include SSTI, XSS, SQL injection, command injection, password hashing, secure deserialization, AES-GCM, secrets, file uploads, and CI/CD security testing. Use it to practice exam-style scenarios and spot distractors.

Content preview

ENGV 380 Final Exam Project &
Construction Management Questions
& Answers Liberty University 2026
Updated | Verified Questions
ENGV 380 Final Exam Project & Construction | Comprehensive
Examination
ENGV 380 Final Exam Project & Construction Management
Questions & Answers Liberty University 2026 Updated actual
exam preparation document with verified questions, complete




INTRODUCTION
This document is an important and very helpful preparation
resource for ENGV 380 Final Exam Project & Construction
Management Questions & Answers Liberty University 2026
Updated. Every item uses a focused exam stem, four response
options, a keyed response, and a clear rationale, making it
easier to understand the subject, spot distractors, and build real
exam confidence.




Page 1

, Question 1
A contractor is choosing between a lump-sum and a cost-plus-fee contract for a
project with high scope uncertainty. Which delivery/contract pairing best
aligns incentives and risk?
A. Lump-sum with a guaranteed maximum price (GMP) and shared
savings.
B. Cost-plus-fee with an open-book audit clause and no cap.
C. Unit-price contract with re-measured quantities.
D. Design-build with a fixed fee and no contingency.
Correct Answer: A - Lump-sum with a guaranteed maximum
price (GMP) and shared savings.


RATIONALE
A GMP with shared savings transfers cost-overrun risk to the
contractor while allowing owner participation in savings, balancing
incentives under uncertainty. Pure cost-plus lacks cost discipline;
unit-price requires well-defined quantities; fixed-fee design-build
without contingency is unrealistic for high uncertainty.

Question 2
A 6-activity CPM network has two critical paths. Activity X (critical) is
delayed 5 days due to owner changes. What is the most likely contractual
outcome under standard AIA A201?
A. No time extension because another critical path exists.
B. Time extension of 5 days and possibly cost compensation.
C. Time extension of 2.5 days (shared float).
D. Contractor bears the delay as a concurrent delay.
Correct Answer: B - Time extension of 5 days and possibly cost
compensation.




Page 2

, RATIONALE
A delay to any critical path extends project duration, so the contractor
is entitled to a time extension; owner-caused changes also support cost
compensation. Float is not shared unless the contract says so;
concurrent delay requires independent parallel delay, not merely
multiple critical paths.

Question 3
In a design-build project, the owner wants to retain control over aesthetic
finishes while transferring performance risk. Which contract mechanism best
achieves this?
A. Prescriptive specification with owner-approved samples.
B. Performance specification with a design review board.
C. Bridging documents with a separate architect.
D. Turnkey with no owner involvement.
Correct Answer: B - Performance specification with a design
review board.


RATIONALE
A performance specification transfers performance risk to the
design-builder while a design review board lets the owner influence
aesthetics. Prescriptive specs shift design risk back to the owner;
bridging splits responsibility; turnkey with no involvement forfeits
aesthetic control.

Question 4
A project has a 30% chance of a $500,000 delay claim and a 60% chance of a
$100,000 productivity loss. What is the expected monetary value (EMV) of
these risks?
A. $210,000
B. $150,000
C. $260,000


Page 3

, D. $180,000


Correct Answer: A - $210,000


RATIONALE
EMV = (0.30 × $500,000) + (0.60 × $100,000) = $150,000 + $60,000
= $210,000. Other values reflect arithmetic errors or misapplied
probabilities.

Question 5
Under a standard AIA A201-2017, which situation most clearly constitutes a
'concealed or unknown condition' warranting an equitable adjustment?
A. Differing site conditions not reasonably foreseeable from a site visit.
B. Owner's failure to provide timely permits.
C. Contractor's underestimation of labor productivity.
D. Abnormal weather exceeding historical averages.
Correct Answer: A - Differing site conditions not reasonably
foreseeable from a site visit.


RATIONALE
A201 addresses concealed or unknown physical conditions differing
materially from those indicated, supporting an equitable adjustment.
Permit delays are owner-caused schedule issues; labor
underestimation is contractor risk; abnormal weather is typically a
time extension, not a concealed condition.

Question 6
A contractor's safety program shows a total recordable incident rate (TRIR) of
4.2 versus the industry average of 3.0. Which leading indicator most directly
addresses the gap?
A. Increase post-incident drug testing.
B. Implement daily pre-task hazard analysis and near-miss reporting.
C. Purchase additional workers' compensation insurance.


Page 4

Document information

Uploaded on
September 29, 2026
Number of pages
37
Written in
2026/2027
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
$30.00

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
GoldenExams
4.4
(74)
Sold
81
Followers
20
Items
11448
Last sold
1 day ago



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions